347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31400061)
1. Comparison between functional and intravascular imaging approaches guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: A network meta-analysis of randomized and propensity matching studies.
Iannaccone M; Abdirashid M; Annone U; Saint-Hilary G; Meier P; Chieffo A; Chen S; di Mario C; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; De Benedictis M; Rettegno S; Doronzo B; Gasparini M; Rinaldi M; D'Amico M; D'Ascenzo F
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 31400061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Stent Expansion Guided by Optical Coherence Tomography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound: The ILUMIEN II Study (Observational Study of Optical Coherence Tomography [OCT] in Patients Undergoing Fractional Flow Reserve [FFR] and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention).
Maehara A; Ben-Yehuda O; Ali Z; Wijns W; Bezerra HG; Shite J; Généreux P; Nichols M; Jenkins P; Witzenbichler B; Mintz GS; Stone GW
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 8(13):1704-14. PubMed ID: 26585621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical coherence tomography versus angiography and intravascular ultrasound to guide coronary stent implantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Siddiqi TJ; Khan MS; Karimi Galougahi K; Shlofmitz E; Moses JW; Rao S; West NEJ; Wolff E; Hochler J; Chau K; Khalique O; Shlofmitz RA; Jeremias A; Ali ZA
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Nov; 100 Suppl 1():S44-S56. PubMed ID: 36251325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of Vascular Imaging in Guiding Routine Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Bare Metal Stent and Drug-Eluting Stent Trials.
Alsidawi S; Effat M; Rahman S; Abdallah M; Leesar M
Cardiovasc Ther; 2015 Dec; 33(6):360-6. PubMed ID: 26363283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical Outcomes Following Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies and 17,882 Patients.
Buccheri S; Franchina G; Romano S; Puglisi S; Venuti G; D'Arrigo P; Francaviglia B; Scalia M; Condorelli A; Barbanti M; Capranzano P; Tamburino C; Capodanno D
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Dec; 10(24):2488-2498. PubMed ID: 29153502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Darmoch F; Alraies MC; Al-Khadra Y; Moussa Pacha H; Pinto DS; Osborn EA
J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Mar; 9(5):e013678. PubMed ID: 32075491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravascular modality-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction.
Kim N; Lee JH; Jang SY; Bae MH; Yang DH; Park HS; Cho Y; Jeong MH; Park JS; Kim HS; Hur SH; Seong IW; Cho MC; Kim CJ; Chae SC;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Mar; 95(4):696-703. PubMed ID: 31132217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: An updated systematic review.
Enezate T; Omran J; Al-Dadah AS; Alpert M; White CJ; Abu-Fadel M; Aronow H; Cohen M; Aguirre F; Patel M; Mahmud E
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 92(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 28980386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate coronary artery disease: fractional flow reserve-guided versus intravascular ultrasound-guided.
Nam CW; Yoon HJ; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Hur SH; Kim YN; Chung IS; Koo BK; Tahk SJ; Fearon WF; Kim KB
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 3(8):812-7. PubMed ID: 20723852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical coherence tomography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention compared with other imaging guidance: a meta-analysis.
Kuku KO; Ekanem E; Azizi V; Melaku G; Bui A; Meirovich YF; Dheendsa A; Beyene S; Hideo-Kajita A; Lipinski MJ; Waksman R; Garcia-Garcia HM
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):503-513. PubMed ID: 29151138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Angiography Alone Versus Angiography Plus Optical Coherence Tomography to Guide Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Outcomes From the Pan-London PCI Cohort.
Jones DA; Rathod KS; Koganti S; Hamshere S; Astroulakis Z; Lim P; Sirker A; O'Mahony C; Jain AK; Knight CJ; Dalby MC; Malik IS; Mathur A; Rakhit R; Lockie T; Redwood S; MacCarthy PA; Desilva R; Weerackody R; Wragg A; Smith EJ; Bourantas CV
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jul; 11(14):1313-1321. PubMed ID: 30025725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and conventional angiography-guided percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review, network meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
Park DY; An S; Jolly N; Attanasio S; Yadav N; Gutierrez JA; Nanna MG; Rao SV; Vij A
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Sep; 102(3):440-450. PubMed ID: 37483068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, and fractional flow reserve use in acute myocardial infarction.
Vallabhajosyula S; El Hajj SC; Bell MR; Prasad A; Lerman A; Rihal CS; Holmes DR; Barsness GW
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):E59-E66. PubMed ID: 31724274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcomes of intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography guided percutaneous coronary angiography: A meta regression-based analysis.
Sattar Y; Abdul Razzack A; Kompella R; Alhajri N; Arshad J; Ullah W; Zghouzi M; Mir T; Power D; Qureshi WT; Aljaroudi W; Elgendy IY; Mamas MA; Alraies MC
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Jan; 99(1):E1-E11. PubMed ID: 34668640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Intravascular Imaging, Functional, or Angiographically Guided Coronary Intervention.
Kuno T; Kiyohara Y; Maehara A; Ueyama HA; Kampaktsis PN; Takagi H; Mehran R; Stone GW; Bhatt DL; Mintz GS; Bangalore S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Dec; 82(23):2167-2176. PubMed ID: 37995152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of impaired fractional flow reserve after coronary interventions on outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wolfrum M; Fahrni G; de Maria GL; Knapp G; Curzen N; Kharbanda RK; Fröhlich GM; Banning AP
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2016 Sep; 16(1):177. PubMed ID: 27608682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Network meta-analysis comparing iFR versus FFR versus coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization.
Verardi R; Fioravanti F; Barbero U; Conrotto F; Omedè P; Montefusco A; Moretti C; D'Amico M; Rinaldi M; Escaned J; D'Ascenzo F
J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):725-730. PubMed ID: 30136420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usefulness of Frequency Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Compared with Intravascular Ultrasound as a Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Kim IC; Yoon HJ; Shin ES; Kim MS; Park J; Cho YK; Park HS; Kim H; Nam CW; Han SW; Kim YN; Kim KB; Hur SH
J Interv Cardiol; 2016 Apr; 29(2):216-24. PubMed ID: 26927366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fractional flow reserve versus intravascular imaging to guide decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention in intermediate lesions: A meta-analysis.
Liu X; Zhang Y; Xu Y; Tang Z; Wang X; Nie S; Mintz GS
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2023 Dec; 102(7):1198-1209. PubMed ID: 37937727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient-Level Data From 2,345 Randomized Patients.
Shin DH; Hong SJ; Mintz GS; Kim JS; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(21):2232-2239. PubMed ID: 27744039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
