These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31400224)

  • 1. Long-term outcomes and five-year recurrence-free survival curves after native-tissue prolapse repair.
    Deo G; Bernasconi DP; Cola A; Palmieri S; Spelzini F; Milani R; Manodoro S; Frigerio M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2019 Nov; 147(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 31400224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Native-tissue prolapse repair: Efficacy and adverse effects of uterosacral ligaments suspension at 10-year follow up.
    Cola A; Marino G; Milani R; Barba M; Volontè S; Spelzini F; Manodoro S; Frigerio M
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2022 Oct; 159(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 35044675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):203-206. PubMed ID: 29697546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [A five-year analysis of effect on transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension with or without native-tissue repair for middle compartment defect].
    Zhang YH; Lu YX; Liu X; Liu JX; Shen WJ; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jul; 54(7):445-451. PubMed ID: 31365956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension: An alternative to McCall culdoplasty in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Novara L; Sgro LG; Pecchio S; Ottino L; Tomatis V; Biglia N
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Sep; 240():278-281. PubMed ID: 31351324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term effectiveness of transvaginal high uterosacral ligament suspension].
    Duan L; Lu YX; Shen WJ; Liu X; Liu JX; Zhang YH; Ge J; Zhao Y; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 52(6):363-368. PubMed ID: 28647957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of Transvaginal High Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension: Over 500-Patient Single-Center Study.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Cola A; Beretta C; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 28230565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transvaginal uterosacral ligament hysteropexy versus hysterectomy plus uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched cohort study.
    Milani R; Manodoro S; Cola A; Bellante N; Palmieri S; Frigerio M
    Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Sep; 31(9):1867-1872. PubMed ID: 31848662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk factors for recurrence after hysterectomy plus native-tissue repair as primary treatment for genital prolapse.
    Manodoro S; Frigerio M; Cola A; Spelzini F; Milani R
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jan; 29(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 28815283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jelovsek JE; Barber MD; Brubaker L; Norton P; Gantz M; Richter HE; Weidner A; Menefee S; Schaffer J; Pugh N; Meikle S;
    JAMA; 2018 Apr; 319(15):1554-1565. PubMed ID: 29677302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concomitant Anterior Repair, Preoperative Prolapse Severity, and Anatomic Prolapse Outcomes After Vaginal Apical Procedures.
    Nager CW; Grimes CL; Nolen TL; Wai CY; Brubaker L; Jeppson PC; Wilson TS; Visco AG; Barber MD; Sutkin G; Norton P; Rardin CR; Arya L; Wallace D; Meikle SF;
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29232267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term outcomes and predictors of failure after surgery for stage IV apical pelvic organ prolapse.
    Linder BJ; El-Nashar SA; Mukwege AA; Weaver AL; McGree ME; Rhodes DJ; Gebhart JB; Klingele CJ; Occhino JA; Trabuco EC
    Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Jun; 29(6):803-810. PubMed ID: 28921036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal native-tissue repair of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Milani R; Frigerio M; Vellucci FL; Palmieri S; Spelzini F; Manodoro S
    Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Aug; 70(4):371-377. PubMed ID: 29376621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension: A Retrospective Cohort of Absorbable and Permanent Suture Groups.
    Bradley MS; Bickhaus JA; Amundsen CL; Newcomb LK; Truong T; Weidner AC; Siddiqui NY
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 28657988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Estimated levator ani subtended volume: a novel assay for predicting surgical failure after uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Wyman AM; Rodrigues AA; Hahn L; Greene KA; Bassaly R; Hart S; Miladinovic B; Hoyte L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 May; 214(5):611.e1-6. PubMed ID: 26596232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Long-term outcomes of the high vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension in treatment of the severe pelvic organ prolapse].
    Lu YX; Wang J; Shen WJ; Zhang YH; Liu JX; Zhao Y; Ge J; Niu K; Wang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 48(8):564-9. PubMed ID: 24199919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of Manchester procedure combined with high uterosacral ligament suspension for uterine prolapse.
    Wang Q; Wu N; Li Y; Lin C; Xu Y; Chen X
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Apr; 49(4):1273-1282. PubMed ID: 36734101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.