720 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31401130)
1. Clinical results of bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty (BIO-RSA) associated with an onlay 145° curved stem in patients with cuff tear arthropathy: a comparative study.
Franceschetti E; Ranieri R; Giovanetti de Sanctis E; Palumbo A; Franceschi F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jan; 29(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 31401130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Bessière C; Chelli M; Gauci MO; Lemmex DB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2111-2122. PubMed ID: 32505414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angled BIO-RSA (bony-increased offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty): a solution for the management of glenoid bone loss and erosion.
Boileau P; Morin-Salvo N; Gauci MO; Seeto BL; Chalmers PN; Holzer N; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Dec; 26(12):2133-2142. PubMed ID: 28735842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treating cuff tear arthropathy by reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: do the inclination of the humeral component and the lateral offset of the glenosphere influence the clinical and the radiological outcome?
Holschen M; Kiriazis A; Bockmann B; Schulte TL; Witt KA; Steinbeck J
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):307-315. PubMed ID: 33880654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.
Freislederer F; Moroder P; Audigé L; Schneller T; Ameziane Y; Trefzer R; Imiolczyk JP; Scheibel M
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Mar; 25(1):204. PubMed ID: 38454432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Grammont humeral design versus onlay curved-stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.
Merolla G; Walch G; Ascione F; Paladini P; Fabbri E; Padolino A; Porcellini G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Apr; 27(4):701-710. PubMed ID: 29290604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty decrease scapular notching?
Athwal GS; MacDermid JC; Reddy KM; Marsh JP; Faber KJ; Drosdowech D
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Mar; 24(3):468-73. PubMed ID: 25441556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of 145° onlay curved stem versus 155° inlay straight stem reverse shoulder arthroplasty: clinical and radiographic results with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
Giordano MC; Corona K; Morris BJ; Mocini F; Saturnino L; Cerciello S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Oct; 31(10):2089-2095. PubMed ID: 35430369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty vs. metal augments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized clinical trial with 2-year follow-up.
Van de Kleut ML; Yuan X; Teeter MG; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Mar; 31(3):591-600. PubMed ID: 34968693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Onlay versus Inlay humeral steam in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA): clinical and biomechanical study.
Beltrame A; Di Benedetto P; Cicuto C; Cainero V; Chisoni R; Causero A
Acta Biomed; 2019 Dec; 90(12-S):54-63. PubMed ID: 31821285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lateralized vs. classic Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty for cuff deficiency Hamada stage 1-3: does the design make a difference?
Freislederer F; Toft F; Audigé L; Marzel A; Endell D; Scheibel M
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):341-351. PubMed ID: 34450279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Oct; 26(10):1726-1731. PubMed ID: 28528016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Standard versus bony increased-offset reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective comparative cohort study.
Collin P; Liu X; Denard PJ; Gain S; Nowak A; Lädermann A
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 28969891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the best glenoid configuration in onlay reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Lädermann A; Denard PJ; Boileau P; Farron A; Deransart P; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Jun; 42(6):1339-1346. PubMed ID: 29492611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Clinical Performance of Inlay versus Onlay Humerus Implants in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Lee HJ; Yoon CY; Kim YS
Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Feb; 15(1):135-144. PubMed ID: 36778983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical performance of lateralized versus non-lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study.
Greiner S; Schmidt C; Herrmann S; Pauly S; Perka C
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1397-404. PubMed ID: 26163281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lateralized Center of Rotation and Lower Neck-Shaft Angle Are Associated With Lower Rates of Scapular Notching and Heterotopic Ossification and Improved Pain for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at 1 Year.
Nelson R; Lowe JT; Lawler SM; Fitzgerald M; Mantell MT; Jawa A
Orthopedics; 2018 Jul; 41(4):230-236. PubMed ID: 29913030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early restoration of shoulder function in patients with the Grammont prosthesis compared to lateralized humeral design in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Lee JH; Chun YM; Kim DS; Lee DH; Shin SJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Nov; 30(11):2533-2542. PubMed ID: 33813010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency.
Rangarajan R; Blout CK; Patel VV; Bastian SA; Lee BK; Itamura JM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7S):S139-S148. PubMed ID: 32643608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Glenosphere size in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: is larger better for external rotation and abduction strength?
Müller AM; Born M; Jung C; Flury M; Kolling C; Schwyzer HK; Audigé L
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Jan; 27(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 28747277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
