These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31401217)

  • 1. Attentional guidance varies with display density.
    Van de Weijgert M; Van der Burg E; Donk M
    Vision Res; 2019 Nov; 164():1-11. PubMed ID: 31401217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competing Distractors Facilitate Visual Search in Heterogeneous Displays.
    Kong G; Alais D; Van der Burg E
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160914. PubMed ID: 27508298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
    Grubert A; Eimer M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Visual search for feature singletons: multiple mechanisms produce sequence effects in visual search.
    Rangelov D; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23912066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Search efficiency is not sufficient: The nature of search modulates stimulus-driven attention.
    Jung K; Han SW; Min Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):61-70. PubMed ID: 30276609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.
    Tanda T; Kawahara JI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1880-1889. PubMed ID: 31114955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
    Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
    J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cross-modal influences on attentional asymmetries: Additive effects of attentional orienting and arousal.
    Thomas NA; Barone AJ; Flew AH; Nicholls MER
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Feb; 96():39-51. PubMed ID: 28063992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A feature-weighting account of priming in conjunction search.
    Becker SI; Horstmann G
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):258-72. PubMed ID: 19304616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In visual search, guidance by surface type is different than classic guidance.
    Wolfe JM; Reijnen E; Van Wert MJ; Kuzmova Y
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):765-73. PubMed ID: 19236891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Which search are you on? Adapting to color while searching for shape.
    Bergmann N; Tünnermann J; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):457-477. PubMed ID: 31741316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-based attentional control for distractor suppression.
    Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1075-1085. PubMed ID: 38418806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of target and distractor heterogeneity on search for a color target.
    Nagy AL; Neriani KE; Young TL
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1885-99. PubMed ID: 15797778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Saccadic selectivity in complex visual search displays.
    Pomplun M
    Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1886-900. PubMed ID: 16445960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible weighting of target features based on distractor context.
    Lee J; Geng JJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):739-751. PubMed ID: 31741317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-nontarget similarity decreases search efficiency and increases stimulus-driven control in visual search.
    Barras C; Kerzel D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):2037-2043. PubMed ID: 28681179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Display probability modulates attentional capture by onset distractors.
    Sayim B; Grubert A; Herzog MH; Krummenacher J
    J Vis; 2010 Mar; 10(3):10.1-8. PubMed ID: 20377287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learned distractor rejection in the face of strong target guidance.
    Stilwell BT; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 Sep; 46(9):926-941. PubMed ID: 32391708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.