These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31401432)

  • 1. The role of reward and task demand in value-based strategic allocation of auditory comprehension effort.
    Zhang M; Siegle GJ; McNeil MR; Pratt SR; Palmer C
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 381():107775. PubMed ID: 31401432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of reward on listening effort as reflected by the pupil dilation response.
    Koelewijn T; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():106-112. PubMed ID: 30096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG.
    Miles K; McMahon C; Boisvert I; Ibrahim R; de Lissa P; Graham P; Lyxell B
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517706396. PubMed ID: 28752807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupil Dilation and Microsaccades Provide Complementary Insights into the Dynamics of Arousal and Instantaneous Attention during Effortful Listening.
    Contadini-Wright C; Magami K; Mehta N; Chait M
    J Neurosci; 2023 Jun; 43(26):4856-4866. PubMed ID: 37127361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.
    Wagner AE; Nagels L; Toffanin P; Opie JM; Başkent D
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519845596. PubMed ID: 31131729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short Implicit Voice Training Affects Listening Effort During a Voice Cue Sensitivity Task With Vocoder-Degraded Speech.
    Biçer A; Koelewijn T; Başkent D
    Ear Hear; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 44(4):900-916. PubMed ID: 36695603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Previous Mental Load and Incentives Influence Anticipatory Arousal as Indexed by the Baseline Pupil Diameter in a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Alfandari D; Richter M; Wendt D; Fiedler L; Naylor G
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231196520. PubMed ID: 37847850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Tipping Point in Listening Effort: Effects of Linguistic Complexity and Age-Related Hearing Loss on Sentence Comprehension.
    Ayasse ND; Wingfield A
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518790907. PubMed ID: 30235973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.
    Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):615-628. PubMed ID: 33027198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing.
    Koelewijn T; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching.
    McCloy DR; Lau BK; Larson E; Pratt KAI; Lee AKC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2440. PubMed ID: 28464660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Time-specific Components of Pupil Responses Reveal Alternations in Effort Allocation Caused by Memory Task Demands During Speech Identification in Noise.
    Książek P; Zekveld AA; Fiedler L; Kramer SE; Wendt D
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165231153280. PubMed ID: 36938784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task.
    Wang Y; Naylor G; Kramer SE; Zekveld AA; Wendt D; Ohlenforst B; Lunner T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):573-582. PubMed ID: 29117062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigating the Influences of Task Demand and Reward on Cardiac Pre-Ejection Period Reactivity During a Speech-in-Noise Task.
    Plain B; Richter M; Zekveld AA; Lunner T; Bhuiyan T; Kramer SE
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):718-731. PubMed ID: 33201048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.