These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31402390)

  • 1. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) and the WHO Minimal Generic Set of Domains of Functioning and Health versus Conventional Instruments in subacute stroke.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Hurme S; Laimi K
    J Rehabil Med; 2019 Oct; 51(9):675-682. PubMed ID: 31402390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule versus Functional Independence Measure in Traumatic Brain Injury.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Koivisto M
    J Rehabil Med; 2023 Nov; 55():jrm16274. PubMed ID: 38032144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule and the World Health Organization minimal generic set of domains of functioning and health in spinal cord injury.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Kaljonen A; Laimi K
    J Rehabil Med; 2019 Jan; 51(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30406265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting institutionalization after Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation using the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Koivisto M
    J Rehabil Med; 2023 Aug; 55():jrm6531. PubMed ID: 37548437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Disability in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with traumatic brain injury using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 and the International Classification of Functioning minimal generic set.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Kaljonen A; Laimi K
    Int J Rehabil Res; 2018 Sep; 41(3):224-229. PubMed ID: 30095553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing disability between traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Tenovuo O; Kaljonen A; Laimi K
    Clin Rehabil; 2018 Dec; 32(12):1676-1683. PubMed ID: 29962230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing functioning in spinal cord injury and in chronic spinal pain with two ICF-based instruments: WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Kaljonen A; Laimi K
    Clin Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 33(7):1241-1251. PubMed ID: 30935211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation with the ICF Measure of Participation and Activities Screener and the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II in persons with spinal cord injury.
    van der Zee CH; Post MW; Brinkhof MW; Wagenaar RC
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2014 Jan; 95(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24008052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Usability of World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule in chronic traumatic brain injury.
    Tarvonen-Schröder S; Tenovuo O; Kaljonen A; Laimi K
    J Rehabil Med; 2018 Jun; 50(6):514-518. PubMed ID: 29767229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patient- and proxy-perceptions on functioning after stroke rehabilitation using the 12-item WHODAS 2.0: a longitudinal cohort study.
    Kilkki M; Stolt M; Rannikko S; Pasanen M; Tarvonen-Schröder S
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Feb; 46(4):783-792. PubMed ID: 36786275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The measurement of functioning using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: comparing qualifier ratings with existing health status instruments.
    Prodinger B; Stucki G; Coenen M; Tennant A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2019 Mar; 41(5):541-548. PubMed ID: 28988490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for Hebrew-speaking subjects with and without hand injury.
    Marom BS; Carel RS; Sharabi M; Ratzon NZ
    Disabil Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 39(12):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 27291062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of the 36-item and 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS-II) in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
    Park SH; Demetriou EA; Pepper KL; Song YJC; Thomas EE; Hickie IB; Glozier N; Guastella AJ
    Autism Res; 2019 Jul; 12(7):1101-1111. PubMed ID: 31033250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke.
    Hu HY; Chi WC; Chang KH; Yen CF; Escorpizo R; Liao HF; Huang SW; Liou TH
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2017 Dec; 53(6):856-862. PubMed ID: 28627860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) among general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability - systematic review.
    Saltychev M; Katajapuu N; Bärlund E; Laimi K
    Disabil Rehabil; 2021 Mar; 43(6):789-794. PubMed ID: 31335215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimal important difference of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in persons with chronic low back pain.
    Wong JJ; Hogg-Johnson S; De Groote W; Ćwirlej-Sozańska A; Garin O; Ferrer M; Acuña ÀP; Côté P
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2023 Dec; 31(1):49. PubMed ID: 38053118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing the modified rankin scale using concepts of the international classification of functioning, disability and health.
    Berzina G; Sveen U; Paanalahti M; Sunnerhagen KS
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2016 Apr; 52(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 26006081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The reliability and validity of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS-II) in stroke.
    Küçükdeveci AA; Kutlay Ş; Yıldızlar D; Öztuna D; Elhan AH; Tennant A
    Disabil Rehabil; 2013 Feb; 35(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 22671861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) to estimate disability after stroke.
    Dos Santos HM; Pereira GS; de Oliveira LC; da Silva PK; Lima MG; Feliz VHAA; Faria CDCM; Silva SM
    Disabil Rehabil; 2023 Jun; 45(13):2169-2174. PubMed ID: 35672154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule II: contribution to the Italian validation.
    Federici S; Meloni F; Mancini A; Lauriola M; Olivetti Belardinelli M
    Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(7):553-64. PubMed ID: 19191060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.