163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31403585)
1. Externally Validated Score to Predict Cesarean Delivery After Labor Induction With Cervi Ripening.
Jochum F; Le Ray C; Blanc-Petitjean P; Langer B; Meyer N; Severac F; Sananes N
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 134(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 31403585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Externally Validated Prediction Model of Vaginal Delivery After Preterm Induction With Unfavorable Cervix.
Kawakita T; Reddy UM; Huang JC; Auguste TC; Bauer D; Overcash RT
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 136(4):716-724. PubMed ID: 32925613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction Model for Vaginal Birth After Induction of Labor in Women With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
Beninati MJ; Ramos SZ; Danilack VA; Has P; Savitz DA; Werner EF
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):402-410. PubMed ID: 32649502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of successful labor induction with very unfavorable cervix: A comparison of six scores.
Tollon P; Blanc-Petitjean P; Drumez E; Ghesquière L; Le Ray C; Garabedian C
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jan; 160(1):53-58. PubMed ID: 35246840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A validated calculator to estimate risk of cesarean after an induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix.
Levine LD; Downes KL; Parry S; Elovitz MA; Sammel MD; Srinivas SK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2):254.e1-254.e7. PubMed ID: 29224730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate.
Lee DS; Tandel MD; Kwan L; Francoeur AA; Duong HL; Negi M
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Mar; 4(2):100534. PubMed ID: 34808400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictive factors for successful cervical ripening using a double-balloon catheter after previous cesarean delivery.
Vital M; Grange J; Le Thuaut A; Dimet J; Ducarme G
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Sep; 142(3):288-294. PubMed ID: 29893994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of vaginal delivery after cervical ripening using a synthetic osmotic dilator.
Saad AF; Gupta J; Hruban L; Hankins GD; Saade GR
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Mar; 246():160-164. PubMed ID: 32028144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z
Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prediction of the risk of cesarean delivery after labor induction in twin gestations based on clinical and ultrasound parameters.
Han BR; Park KH; Lee SY; Jung EY; Park JW
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2016 Sep; 42(9):1125-31. PubMed ID: 27199212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Externally Validated Model to Predict Prolonged Induction of Labor with an Unfavorable Cervix.
Kawakita T; Saeed H; Huang JC
Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e3140-e3146. PubMed ID: 37863073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Target populations to reduce cesarean rates after induced labor: A national population-based cohort study.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Schmitz T; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Mar; 99(3):406-412. PubMed ID: 31628852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Double-balloon catheter for induction of labour in women with a previous cesarean section, could it be the best choice?
De Bonrostro Torralba C; Tejero Cabrejas EL; Marti Gamboa S; Lapresta Moros M; Campillos Maza JM; Castán Mateo S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 May; 295(5):1135-1143. PubMed ID: 28315935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women.
Vrouenraets FP; Roumen FJ; Dehing CJ; van den Akker ES; Aarts MJ; Scheve EJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):690-7. PubMed ID: 15802392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
