These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31403807)

  • 1. Age differences in emotion-induced blindness: Positivity effects in early attention.
    Kennedy BL; Huang R; Mather M
    Emotion; 2020 Oct; 20(7):1266-1278. PubMed ID: 31403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the relative sensitivity of spatial and nonspatial measures of attentional bias: Emotion-induced blindness, the dot probe, and gradations in ratings of negative pictures.
    Onie S; Most SB
    Emotion; 2022 Dec; 22(8):1942-1951. PubMed ID: 34591501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Negative images, regardless of task relevance, distract younger more than older adults.
    Kennedy BL; Mather M
    Psychol Aging; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38934924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of instrumentality of emotion in the age-related positivity effect.
    Fung HH; Lu M; Ho OT
    Emotion; 2021 Feb; 21(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 31750708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Age differences in emotion regulation effort: Pupil response distinguishes reappraisal and distraction for older but not younger adults.
    Martins B; Florjanczyk J; Jackson NJ; Gatz M; Mather M
    Psychol Aging; 2018 Mar; 33(2):338-349. PubMed ID: 29658751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age-related differences in attention and memory toward emotional stimuli.
    Bi D; Han B
    Psych J; 2015 Sep; 4(3):155-9. PubMed ID: 26354156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Age differences in regulating negative emotions via attentional deployment.
    Wirth M; Kunzmann U
    Psychol Aging; 2018 May; 33(3):384-398. PubMed ID: 29756797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Older Adult Positivity Effect in Evaluations of Trustworthiness: Emotion Regulation or Cognitive Capacity?
    Zebrowitz LA; Boshyan J; Ward N; Gutchess A; Hadjikhani N
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0169823. PubMed ID: 28060919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of emotional faces on younger and older adults' attentional blink.
    Sklenar AM; Mienaltowski A
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Nov; 33(7):1436-1447. PubMed ID: 30714505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Are Age Effects in Positivity Influenced by the Valence of Distractors?
    Ziaei M; von Hippel W; Henry JD; Becker SI
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0137604. PubMed ID: 26366872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Manipulations of distractor frequency do not mitigate emotion-induced blindness.
    Zhao JL; Most SB
    Cogn Emot; 2019 May; 33(3):442-451. PubMed ID: 29644917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Now you feel it, now you don't: Motivated attention to emotional content is modulated by age and task demands.
    Pehlivanoglu D; Verhaeghen P
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 19(5):1299-1316. PubMed ID: 31367982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Habituation to emotional distractors attenuates emotion-induced blindness.
    Jia L; Wang L; Sung B; Wang C; Chen D; Wang J
    Emotion; 2022 Sep; 22(6):1359-1367. PubMed ID: 36006702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Arousal and Context on Recognition Memory for Emotional Pictures in Younger and Older Adults.
    Wang Y; Yang J
    Exp Aging Res; 2017; 43(2):124-148. PubMed ID: 28230422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Semantic relatedness and distinctive processing may inflate older adults' positive memory bias.
    Ack Baraly KT; Morand A; Fusca L; Davidson PSR; Hot P
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Oct; 47(7):1431-1443. PubMed ID: 31254177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited time horizons lead to the positivity effect in attention, but not to more positive emotions: An investigation of the socioemotional selectivity theory.
    Zsoldos I; Hot P
    Psychol Aging; 2024 Feb; 39(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 37824237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do emotion-induced blindness and the attentional blink share underlying mechanisms? An event-related potential study of emotionally-arousing words.
    MacLeod J; Stewart BM; Newman AJ; Arnell KM
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 17(3):592-611. PubMed ID: 28265963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual attention and emotional reactions to negative stimuli: The role of age and cognitive reappraisal.
    Wirth M; Isaacowitz DM; Kunzmann U
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Sep; 32(6):543-556. PubMed ID: 28891668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cultural differences in the age-related positivity effect: Distinguishing between preference and effectiveness.
    Fung HH; Gong X; Ngo N; Isaacowitz DM
    Emotion; 2019 Dec; 19(8):1414-1424. PubMed ID: 30475027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An elusive deficit: Psychopathic personality traits and aberrant attention to emotional stimuli.
    Kimonis ER; Kidd J; Most SB; Krynen A; Liu C
    Emotion; 2020 Sep; 20(6):951-964. PubMed ID: 30945889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.