These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases. Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The future of Cochrane Neonatal. Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigation of text-mining methodologies to aid the construction of search strategies in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy-a case study. O'Keefe H; Rankin J; Wallace SA; Beyer F Res Synth Methods; 2023 Jan; 14(1):79-98. PubMed ID: 35841125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging. Itri JN; Patel SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 29528716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Facilitating the planning and evaluation of narrative intervention reviews: Systematic Transparency Assessment in Intervention Reviews (STAIR). Gonot-Schoupinsky FN; Garip G; Sheffield D Eval Program Plann; 2022 Apr; 91():102043. PubMed ID: 34839113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Philosophy of biology: naturalistic or transcendental? Kolen F; Van de Vijver G Acta Biotheor; 2007; 55(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17619172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Haby MM; Chapman E; Clark R; Barreto J; Reveiz L; Lavis JN Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Nov; 14(1):83. PubMed ID: 27884208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data]. Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The relevance to meta-analysis, systematic reviews and the cochrane collaboration to clinical psychiatry. Tharyan P Indian J Psychiatry; 1998 Apr; 40(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 21494461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cognitive biases and heuristics in medical decision making: a critical review using a systematic search strategy. Blumenthal-Barby JS; Krieger H Med Decis Making; 2015 May; 35(4):539-57. PubMed ID: 25145577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re-evaluating concepts of biological function in clinical medicine: towards a new naturalistic theory of disease. Chin-Yee B; Upshur REG Theor Med Bioeth; 2017 Aug; 38(4):245-264. PubMed ID: 28660393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews. Haddaway NR; Woodcock P; Macura B; Collins A Conserv Biol; 2015 Dec; 29(6):1596-605. PubMed ID: 26032263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A survey of prevalence of narrative and systematic reviews in five major medical journals. Faggion CM; Bakas NP; Wasiak J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):176. PubMed ID: 29281975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]