These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31404294)

  • 1. Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.
    Chieze M; Hurst S; Kaiser S; Sentissi O
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():491. PubMed ID: 31404294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review.
    Kersting XAK; Hirsch S; Steinert T
    Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():400. PubMed ID: 31244695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seclusion versus mechanical restraint in psychiatry - a systematic review.
    Gleerup CS; Østergaard SD; Hjuler RS
    Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2019 Oct; 31(5):237-245. PubMed ID: 31190673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Lincoln TM; Fischer R; Nagel M
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Apr; 28(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 32348607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.
    Flammer E; Frank U; Steinert T
    Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():146. PubMed ID: 32194460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variables Associated With the Subjective Experience of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Inpatients: A Systematic Review.
    Aguilera-Serrano C; Guzman-Parra J; Garcia-Sanchez JA; Moreno-Küstner B; Mayoral-Cleries F
    Can J Psychiatry; 2018 Feb; 63(2):129-144. PubMed ID: 29069981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Post-seclusion/post-restraint debriefing with patients-overview and current situation].
    Krieger E; Fischer R; Moritz S; Nagel M
    Nervenarzt; 2021 Jan; 92(1):44-49. PubMed ID: 32725493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prevalence and risk factors for seclusion and restraint in old-age psychiatry inpatient units.
    Chieze M; Kaiser S; Courvoisier D; Hurst S; Sentissi O; Fredouille J; Wullschleger A
    BMC Psychiatry; 2021 Feb; 21(1):82. PubMed ID: 33557780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Treat me with respect". A systematic review and thematic analysis of psychiatric patients' reported perceptions of the situations associated with the process of coercion.
    Tingleff EB; Bradley SK; Gildberg FA; Munksgaard G; Hounsgaard L
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2017 Nov; 24(9-10):681-698. PubMed ID: 28665512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled comparison of seclusion and mechanical restraint in inpatient settings.
    Bergk J; Einsiedler B; Flammer E; Steinert T
    Psychiatr Serv; 2011 Nov; 62(11):1310-7. PubMed ID: 22211210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.
    Chieze M; Clavien C; Kaiser S; Hurst S
    Front Psychiatry; 2021; 12():790886. PubMed ID: 34970171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental health nurses' emotions, exposure to patient aggression, attitudes to and use of coercive measures: Cross sectional questionnaire survey.
    Jalil R; Huber JW; Sixsmith J; Dickens GL
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2017 Oct; 75():130-138. PubMed ID: 28797822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patients' attitudes towards and acceptance of coercion in psychiatry.
    Krieger E; Moritz S; Weil R; Nagel M
    Psychiatry Res; 2018 Feb; 260():478-485. PubMed ID: 29287276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [How do adolescent inpatients experience seclusion and other coercive measures?].
    van der Laan MC; Rietveld T; de Boer SB
    Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2016; 58(6):471-5. PubMed ID: 27320511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [About the use of seclusion in psychiatry: the patients' point of view].
    Palazzolo J
    Encephale; 2004; 30(3):276-84. PubMed ID: 15235526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures.
    Janssen WA; van de Sande R; Noorthoorn EO; Nijman HL; Bowers L; Mulder CL; Smit A; Widdershoven GA; Steinert T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(6):429-38. PubMed ID: 22079087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nurses' experiences of restraint and seclusion use in short-stay acute old age psychiatry inpatient units: a qualitative study.
    Muir-Cochrane EC; Baird J; McCann TV
    J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2015 Mar; 22(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 25524501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nurses' and consumers' shared experiences of seclusion and restraint: A qualitative literature review.
    Hawsawi T; Power T; Zugai J; Jackson D
    Int J Ment Health Nurs; 2020 Oct; 29(5):831-845. PubMed ID: 32198811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES)--validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures.
    Bergk J; Flammer E; Steinert T
    BMC Psychiatry; 2010 Jan; 10():5. PubMed ID: 20074355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Methodological and ethical challenges in studying patients' perceptions of coercion: a systematic mixed studies review.
    Soininen P; Putkonen H; Joffe G; Korkeila J; Välimäki M
    BMC Psychiatry; 2014 Jun; 14():162. PubMed ID: 24894162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.