305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31404678)
1. Location of the mandibular lingula: Comparison of skeletal Class I and Class III patients in relation to ramus osteotomy using cone-beam computed tomography.
Akcay H; Kalabalık F; Tatar B; Ulu M
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Dec; 120(6):504-508. PubMed ID: 31404678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Determining the safety margin of mandibular lingula in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Tekin G; Kose NS; Ugurlu M; Dereci O; Kosar YC; Gojayeva G; Caliskan G
Surg Radiol Anat; 2024 Feb; 46(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 38244088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphometric analysis of mandibular corpus relevance to sagittal split osteotomy: Comparison of dentoskeletal Class I and Class III patients.
Kalabalik F; Akçay H; Tatar B
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):615-620. PubMed ID: 32220608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional anatomic analysis of the lingula and mandibular foramen: a cone beam computed tomography study.
Findik Y; Yildirim D; Baykul T
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):607-10. PubMed ID: 24448541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Morphological evaluation of the mandibular lingula using cone-beam computed tomography.
Senel B; Ozkan A; Altug HA
Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2015; 74(4):497-502. PubMed ID: 26620512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the mandibular split patterns in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Hou M; Yu TP; Wang JG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 73(5):985-93. PubMed ID: 25883003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Mandibular Anatomy Associated With Bad Splits in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy of Mandible.
Wang T; Han JJ; Oh HK; Park HJ; Jung S; Park YJ; Kook MS
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 27(5):e500-4. PubMed ID: 27391522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Three-dimensional changes in condylar position in skeletal class Ⅲ patients with mandibular deviation after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy].
Huang JQ; Huang Z; Wu J; Wang YJ; Sang T; Liu F; Zheng Y
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):649-655. PubMed ID: 31606999
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Liang SW; Chen PH; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 34327588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anatomic study to determine a safe surgical reference point for mandibular ramus osteotomy.
Park KR; Kim SY; Kim GJ; Park HS; Jung YS
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 42(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23454267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Augmented corticotomy combined with accelerated orthodontic forces in class III orthognathic patients: morphologic aspects of the mandibular anterior ridge with cone-beam computed tomography.
Coscia G; Coscia V; Peluso V; Addabbo F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1760.e1-9. PubMed ID: 23773424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A simple method to locate mandibular foramen with cone-beam computed tomography and its relevance to oral and maxillofacial surgery: a radio-anatomical study.
Al-Shayyab MH
Surg Radiol Anat; 2018 Jun; 40(6):625-634. PubMed ID: 29737379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative Study of Mandible Ramus Morphology Using 3-dimensional CT in Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy.
Hirota M; Suga K; Shibahara T
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018 Nov; 59(4):237-245. PubMed ID: 30333371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Position of the mandibular canal before and after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a cone beam computed tomographic study.
Yamashita FC; Iwaki LCV; Yamashita AL; Tolentino ES; Verginio VEO; Moraes TENT; Chicarelli M; Iwaki Filho L
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Apr; 60(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 34311998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of the Location of the Mandibular Lingula in Pediatric Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images.
Aps JKM; Gazdeck LY; Nelson T; Slayton RL; Scott JM
J Dent Child (Chic); 2018 May; 85(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 30345955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation on the condylar displacement following sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric setback patients: Comparison between conventional approach and surgery-first approach.
Oh MH; Hwang HS; Lee KM; Cho JH
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):733-738. PubMed ID: 28530843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the shape, height, and location of the mandibular lingula.
Sekerci AE; Sisman Y
Surg Radiol Anat; 2014 Mar; 36(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 23793815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shape, height, and location of the lingula for sagittal ramus osteotomy in Thais.
Jansisyanont P; Apinhasmit W; Chompoopong S
Clin Anat; 2009 Oct; 22(7):787-93. PubMed ID: 19644966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. CBCT location of the fusion between the buccal and lingual cortical in the mandibular ramus: importance to sagittal split osteotomy.
Scomparin L; Soares MQ; Rubira CM; Yaedú RY; Imada TS; Centurion BS; Tolentino ES; Lauris JR; Rubira-Bullen IR
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2017 Jul; 22(4):e500-e505. PubMed ID: 28624835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
