635 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31404710)
1. Perioperative Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Based on Route of Concurrent Hysterectomy: A Secondary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Cardenas-Trowers O; Stewart JR; Meriwether KV; Francis SL; Gupta A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(4):953-958. PubMed ID: 31404710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minimizing Risks in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Rates of Surgical Site Infection Across Subtypes of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.
Brown O; Geynisman-Tan J; Gillingham A; Collins S; Lewicky-Gaupp C; Kenton K; Mueller M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1370-1376.e1. PubMed ID: 31672589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National Analysis of Perioperative Morbidity of Vaginal Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy at the Time of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension.
Chapman GC; Slopnick EA; Roberts K; Sheyn D; Wherley S; Mahajan ST; Pollard RR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):275-281. PubMed ID: 32450226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vesicoureteral Injury during Benign Hysterectomy: Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic Surgery versus Laparotomy.
Chang EJ; Mandelbaum RS; Nusbaum DJ; Violette CJ; Matsushima K; Klar M; Matsuzaki S; Machida H; Kanao H; Roman LD; Matsuo K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1354-1362. PubMed ID: 31743796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.
Bretschneider CE; Frazzini Padilla P; Das D; Jelovsek JE; Unger CA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):490.e1-490.e8. PubMed ID: 30222939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
Linder BJ; Occhino JA; Habermann EB; Glasgow AE; Bews KA; Gershman B
J Urol; 2018 Oct; 200(4):862-867. PubMed ID: 29630983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Complications after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy with and without concomitant incontinence surgery: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database study.
Clancy AA; Mallick R; Breau RH; Khalil H; Hickling DR
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Sep; 37(7):2234-2241. PubMed ID: 29635701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Financial analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair with concomitant hysterectomy.
El Haraki AS; Shepherd JP; Parker-Autry C; Matthews CA
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 36729164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trends in Same-Day Discharge Rate After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy and Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Postoperative Complication Rates Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
Kim EK; Hong CX; Harvie HS
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Mar; 28(3):e22-e28. PubMed ID: 35272328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduced Complications Following Implementation of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Danish Population-based Cohort Study of Minimally Invasive Benign Gynecologic Surgery between 2004 and 2018.
Settnes A; Topsoee MF; Moeller C; Dueholm M; Kopp TI; Norrbom C; Rasmussen SC; Froeslev PA; Joergensen A; Dreisler E; Gimbel H
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(6):1344-1353.e3. PubMed ID: 31740432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.
Uccella S; Morosi C; Marconi N; Arrigo A; Gisone B; Casarin J; Pinelli C; Borghi C; Ghezzi F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 28711761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 30-day Complication Rates between Laparoscopic Myomectomy and Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Uterine Leiomyoma in Women Older Than Age 40.
Sheyn D; Bretschnieder CE; Mahajan ST; El-Nashar S; Billow M; Ninivaggio CS
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1076-1082. PubMed ID: 30385429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy surgical outcomes with prior versus concomitant hysterectomy.
Dubinskaya A; Hernandez-Aranda D; Wakefield DB; Shepherd JP
Int Urogynecol J; 2020 Feb; 31(2):401-407. PubMed ID: 31256223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of robotic and other minimally invasive routes of hysterectomy for benign indications.
Swenson CW; Kamdar NS; Harris JA; Uppal S; Campbell DA; Morgan DM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Nov; 215(5):650.e1-650.e8. PubMed ID: 27343568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of 30-Day Readmission After Same-Day Compared With Next-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 32459424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
