These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31404811)

  • 21. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scientific inferences in the laboratory and the law.
    Cranor C
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S121-8. PubMed ID: 16030327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
    Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trial and error: the Supreme Court's philosophy of science.
    Haack S
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S66-73. PubMed ID: 16030341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Generalized site occupancy models allowing for false positive and false negative errors.
    Royle JA; Link WA
    Ecology; 2006 Apr; 87(4):835-41. PubMed ID: 16676527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What has a decade of Daubert wrought?
    Berger MA
    Am J Public Health; 2005; 95 Suppl 1():S59-65. PubMed ID: 16030340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Representation and re-presentation in litigation science.
    Jasanoff S
    Environ Health Perspect; 2008 Jan; 116(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 18197311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Error rates in forensic DNA analysis: definition, numbers, impact and communication.
    Kloosterman A; Sjerps M; Quak A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Sep; 12():77-85. PubMed ID: 24905336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Judges and forensic science education: A national survey.
    Garrett BL; Gardner BO; Murphy E; Grimes P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Apr; 321():110714. PubMed ID: 33592556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Of earprints, fingerprints, scent dogs, cot deaths and cognitive contamination--a brief look at the present state of play in the forensic arena.
    Broeders AP
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jun; 159(2-3):148-57. PubMed ID: 16226860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does DNA evidence in the form of a likelihood ratio affect perceivers' sensitivity to the strength of a suspect's alibi?
    Ribeiro G; Tangen J; McKimmie B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1325-1332. PubMed ID: 32748228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Quality management systems and the admissibility of scientific evidence: the Costa Rican experience.
    Salas M; Gomez D
    Bull Narc; 2005; 57(1-2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21338026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mock jurors' use of error rates in DNA database trawls.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2013 Dec; 37(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 23855323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Forensic facial comparison: issues of admissibility in the development of novel analytical technique.
    Mallett X; Evison MP
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul; 58(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 23718761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Random error in cardiovascular meta-analyses: how common are false positive and false negative results?
    AlBalawi Z; McAlister FA; Thorlund K; Wong M; Wetterslev J
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Sep; 168(2):1102-7. PubMed ID: 23218569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Collective intelligence in fingerprint analysis.
    Tangen JM; Kent KM; Searston RA
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):23. PubMed ID: 32430615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents.
    Thompson WC; Newman EJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Aug; 39(4):332-49. PubMed ID: 25984887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. On the (mis)calculation of forensic science error rates.
    Kukucka J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Dec; 119(52):e2215695119. PubMed ID: 36534798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Novel scientific methods in court.
    Hackman L; Nic Daeid N
    Emerg Top Life Sci; 2021 Sep; 5(3):349-357. PubMed ID: 34402863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.