These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31406858)

  • 1. Predictive accuracy of the Braden Q Scale in risk assessment for paediatric pressure ulcer: A meta-analysis.
    Liao Y; Gao G; Mo L
    Int J Nurs Sci; 2018 Oct; 5(4):419-426. PubMed ID: 31406858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in Critical Care: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wei M; Wu L; Chen Y; Fu Q; Chen W; Yang D
    Nurs Crit Care; 2020 May; 25(3):165-170. PubMed ID: 31985893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Braden Scale cannot be used alone for assessing pressure ulcer risk in surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
    He W; Liu P; Chen HL
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2012 Feb; 58(2):34-40. PubMed ID: 22316631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk: a meta-analysis].
    Park SH; Park YS
    J Korean Acad Nurs; 2014 Dec; 44(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 25608538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive efficacy of the Braden Q Scale for pediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment in the PICU: a meta-analysis.
    Chun X; Lin Y; Ma J; He J; Ye L; Yang H
    Pediatr Res; 2019 Oct; 86(4):436-443. PubMed ID: 31216569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for pressure ulcer risk in hospitalized patients.
    Park SH; Choi YK; Kang CB
    J Tissue Viability; 2015 Aug; 24(3):102-13. PubMed ID: 26050532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predicting pressure ulcer risk in pediatric patients: the Braden Q Scale.
    Curley MA; Razmus IS; Roberts KE; Wypij D
    Nurs Res; 2003; 52(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 12552172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predictive validity of the braden scale for pressure injury risk assessment in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Huang C; Ma Y; Wang C; Jiang M; Yuet Foon L; Lv L; Han L
    Nurs Open; 2021 Sep; 8(5):2194-2207. PubMed ID: 33630407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
    Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
    Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
    J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for patients in intensive care units.
    Hyun S; Vermillion B; Newton C; Fall M; Li X; Kaewprag P; Moffatt-Bruce S; Lenz ER
    Am J Crit Care; 2013 Nov; 22(6):514-20. PubMed ID: 24186823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The prognostic ability of early Braden Q Scores in critically ill children.
    Tume LN; Siner S; Scott E; Lane S
    Nurs Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 24529107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of the performance of the Braden Q and the Glamorgan paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales in general and intensive care paediatric and neonatal units.
    Willock J; Habiballah L; Long D; Palmer K; Anthony D
    J Tissue Viability; 2016 May; 25(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 27020863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Accuracy of procalcitonin for diagnosis of sepsis in adults: a Meta-analysis].
    Chengfen Y; Tong L; Xinjing G; Zhibo L; Lei X
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2015 Sep; 27(9):743-9. PubMed ID: 26955701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for pressure ulcers in adult patients: A meta-analysis on sociodemographic factors and the Braden scale.
    Chung ML; Widdel M; Kirchhoff J; Sellin J; Jelali M; Geiser F; Mücke M; Conrad R
    J Clin Nurs; 2023 May; 32(9-10):1979-1992. PubMed ID: 35191111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure Injury Risk Assessment in Pediatric Intensive Care: A Prospective Validation Study of the Glamorgan Scale and Predictive Comparison with the Braden Q Scale.
    Vocci MC; Amante Miot H; Mendes Bertoncello Fontes C; Fernandes Abbade LP
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2023 Mar; 36(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 36806282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using the Braden Q Scale to Predict Pressure Ulcer Risk in pediatric patients.
    Noonan C; Quigley S; Curley MA
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2011 Dec; 26(6):566-75. PubMed ID: 22055377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validation and clinical impact of paediatric pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: A systematic review.
    Kottner J; Hauss A; Schlüer AB; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2013 Jun; 50(6):807-18. PubMed ID: 21645897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.