These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31406858)
21. Assessing Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Scales- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Park SH; Lee HS Iran J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 45(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 27114977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Diagnostic accuracy of artery peak velocity variation measured by bedside real-time ultrasound for prediction of fluid responsiveness: a Meta-analysis]. Pei Y; Yang Y; Feng Y; He S; Zhou J; Jiang H; Wang X Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2020 Jan; 32(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 32148240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Predictive risk scales for development of pressure ulcers in pediatric patients admitted to general ward and intensive care unit. Luo WJ; Zhou XZ; Lei JY; Xu Y; Huang RH World J Clin Cases; 2021 Dec; 9(35):10956-10968. PubMed ID: 35047606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictive validity and reliability of two pressure injury risk assessment scales at a neonatal intensive care unit. Shi Z; Li X Int Wound J; 2023 Oct; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 37798925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale. Jun Seongsook RN; Jeong Ihnsook RN; Lee Younghee RN Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Feb; 41(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 14725784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China. Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for assessing risk of developing pressure ulcers and dependence-related lesions. Roca-Biosca A; Rubio-Rico L; Fernández MIM; Grau NG; Garijo GT; Fernández FPG J Wound Care; 2017 Sep; 26(9):528-536. PubMed ID: 28880761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predictive validity of the EVARUCI scale to evaluate risk for pressure injury in critical care patients. de Souza MFC; Zanei SSV; Whitaker IY J Wound Care; 2023 Aug; 32(Sup8):clxi-clxv. PubMed ID: 37561701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic. Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Use of mobility subscale for risk assessment of pressure ulcer incidence and preventive interventions: A systematic review. Mordiffi SZ; Kent B; Phillips N; Chi Tho P JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2011; 9(56):2417-2481. PubMed ID: 27820427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparison of the Braden Q and the Braden QD Scale to Assess Pediatric Risk for Pressure Injuries During Noninvasive Ventilation. Lauderbaugh DL; Billman G; Popien TL; Hauseur S; Lee E; O'Haver J Respir Care; 2021 Aug; 66(8):1234-1239. PubMed ID: 33975900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. All at-risk patients are not created equal: analysis of Braden pressure ulcer risk scores to identify specific risks. Tescher AN; Branda ME; Byrne TJ; Naessens JM J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):282-91. PubMed ID: 22552104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Predictive Validity of Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment Tools for Elderly: A Meta-Analysis. Park SH; Lee YS; Kwon YM West J Nurs Res; 2016 Apr; 38(4):459-83. PubMed ID: 26337859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence and a modification of the Braden Scale for a rehabilitation unit. Schue RM; Langemo DK J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 1998 Jan; 25(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 9481286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Braden scale (ALB) for assessing pressure ulcer risk in hospital patients: A validity and reliability study. Chen HL; Cao YJ; Zhang W; Wang J; Huai BS Appl Nurs Res; 2017 Feb; 33():169-174. PubMed ID: 28096013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictive and concurrent validity of the Braden scale in long-term care: a meta-analysis. Wilchesky M; Lungu O Wound Repair Regen; 2015; 23(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 25682792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Validity of the Braden Scale in grading pressure ulcers in trauma and burn patients. Griswold LH; Griffin RL; Swain T; Kerby JD J Surg Res; 2017 Nov; 219():151-157. PubMed ID: 29078875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the neonatal/infant Braden Q risk assessment scale. de Lima EL; de Brito MJ; de Souza DM; Salomé GM; Ferreira LM J Tissue Viability; 2016 Feb; 25(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26777790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Challenge of Predicting Pressure Ulcers in Critically Ill Patients. A Multicenter Cohort Study. Ranzani OT; Simpson ES; Japiassú AM; Noritomi DT; Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1775-1783. PubMed ID: 27463839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]