These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31407272)

  • 1. Higher attentional costs for numerosity estimation at high densities.
    Pomè A; Anobile G; Cicchini GM; Scabia A; Burr DC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Nov; 81(8):2604-2611. PubMed ID: 31407272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-systems for visual numerosity: A single case study.
    Anobile G; Tomaiuolo F; Campana S; Cicchini GM
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Jan; 136():107259. PubMed ID: 31726066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Separate mechanisms for perception of numerosity and density.
    Anobile G; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Jan; 25(1):265-70. PubMed ID: 24270462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulating attentional load affects numerosity estimation: evidence against a pre-attentive subitizing mechanism.
    Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3269. PubMed ID: 18813345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does subitizing reflect numerical estimation?
    Revkin SK; Piazza M; Izard V; Cohen L; Dehaene S
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):607-14. PubMed ID: 18578852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources.
    Burr DC; Turi M; Anobile G
    J Vis; 2010 Jun; 10(6):20. PubMed ID: 20884569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Big and small numbers: Empirical support for a single, flexible mechanism for numerosity perception.
    Sengupta R; Bapiraju S; Melcher D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):253-266. PubMed ID: 27797007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space.
    Anobile G; Turi M; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
    Vision Res; 2012 Dec; 74():102-9. PubMed ID: 22727938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decoding of Electroencephalogram Signals Shows No Evidence of a Neural Signature for Subitizing in Sequential Numerosity.
    Fornaciai M; Park J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 33(8):1535-1548. PubMed ID: 34496374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-modal attention modulates tactile subitizing but not tactile numerosity estimation.
    Tian Y; Chen L
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jul; 80(5):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 29549663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating estimation from comparison and response eliminates parietal involvement in sequential numerosity perception.
    Cavdaroglu S; Katz C; Knops A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Aug; 116():135-48. PubMed ID: 25887262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Different reaction-times for subitizing, estimation, and texture.
    Pomè A; Anobile G; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
    J Vis; 2019 Jun; 19(6):14. PubMed ID: 31194220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanisms for perception of numerosity or texture-density are governed by crowding-like effects.
    Anobile G; Turi M; Cicchini GM; Burr DC
    J Vis; 2015; 15(5):4. PubMed ID: 26067522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Numerosity processing is context driven even in the subitizing range: An fMRI study.
    Leibovich T; Henik A; Salti M
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Oct; 77():137-47. PubMed ID: 26297625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linking visual attention and number processing in the brain: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in small and large symbolic and nonsymbolic number comparison.
    Ansari D; Lyons IM; van Eimeren L; Xu F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1845-53. PubMed ID: 17958487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Do estimates of numerosity really adhere to Weber's law? A reexamination of two case studies.
    Testolin A; McClelland JL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):158-168. PubMed ID: 32949010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The second number-estimation elbow: Are visual numbers greater than 20 evaluated differently?
    Portley M; Durgin FH
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1512-1521. PubMed ID: 31267478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Topographic numerosity maps cover subitizing and estimation ranges.
    Cai Y; Hofstetter S; van Dijk J; Zuiderbaan W; van der Zwaag W; Harvey BM; Dumoulin SO
    Nat Commun; 2021 Jun; 12(1):3374. PubMed ID: 34099735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinct Neural Signatures for Very Small and Very Large Numerosities.
    Fornaciai M; Park J
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2017; 11():21. PubMed ID: 28197086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Range dependent processing of visual numerosity: similarities across vision and haptics.
    Plaisier MA; Bergmann Tiest WM; Kappers AM
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 204(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 20549196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.