BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31407420)

  • 1. Characteristics of shared decision making in Romania from the patient perspective: A cross-sectional multicentric study.
    Baicus C; Balanescu P; Zeh S; Oprisan E; Lapadatu R; Gurghean A; Padureanu V; Rezus C; Mitu F; Jurcut R; Balanescu AR; Daha I; Balanescu E; Bojinca M; Pinte L; Constantin AM; Dima N; Floria M; Leon-Constantin MM; Roca M; Mitu M; Chiriac S; Badescu CM; Ionescu SD; Mitrea E; Rosu G; Rezus E; Ionescu GD; Visinescu AM; Mihailescu G; Badea CG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1152-1159. PubMed ID: 31407420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Romanian version of SDM-Q-9 validation in Internal Medicine and Cardiology setting: a multicentric cross-sectional study.
    Baicus C; Balanescu P; Gurghean A; Badea CG; Padureanu V; Rezus C; Mitu F; Jurcut R; Balanescu AR; Daha I; Balanescu E; Bojinca M; Pinte L; Constantin AM; Dima N; Floria M; Leon-Constantin MM; Roca M; Mitu M; Chiriac S; Badescu CM; Ionescu SD; Mitrea E; Rosu G; Ionescu GD; Visinescu AM; Mihailescu G; Lapadatu R; Oprisan E; Zeh S; Scholl I; Härter M
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Jun; 57(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 30721145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) in a national survey in Hungary.
    Rencz F; Tamási B; Brodszky V; Gulácsi L; Weszl M; Péntek M
    Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 1):43-55. PubMed ID: 31111402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patients' perspective on shared decision-making in urology: a prospective study at a university hospital.
    Grüne B; Köther AK; Büdenbender B; Michel MS; Kriegmair MC; Alpers GW
    World J Urol; 2021 Dec; 39(12):4491-4498. PubMed ID: 34338818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Spanish version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire.
    De las Cuevas C; Perestelo-Perez L; Rivero-Santana A; Cebolla-Martí A; Scholl I; Härter M
    Health Expect; 2015 Dec; 18(6):2143-53. PubMed ID: 24593044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To what extent psychiatric patients feel involved in decision making about their mental health care? Relationships with socio-demographic, clinical, and psychological variables.
    De las Cuevas C; Peñate W
    Acta Neuropsychiatr; 2014 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 25288200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Shared decision-making in outpatients with mental disorders: Patients´ preferences and associated factors.
    Morán-Sánchez I; Gómez-Vallés P; Bernal-López MÁ; Pérez-Cárceles MD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2019 Dec; 25(6):1200-1209. PubMed ID: 31373107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.
    Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Härter M
    Health Expect; 2015 Feb; 18(1):137-50. PubMed ID: 23176071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shared decision making, physicians' explanations, and treatment satisfaction: a cross-sectional survey of prostate cancer patients.
    Nakayama K; Osaka W; Matsubara N; Takeuchi T; Toyoda M; Ohtake N; Uemura H
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Dec; 20(1):334. PubMed ID: 33317523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and psychometric properties of the Shared Decision Making Questionnaire--physician version (SDM-Q-Doc).
    Scholl I; Kriston L; Dirmaier J; Buchholz A; Härter M
    Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Aug; 88(2):284-90. PubMed ID: 22480628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patients' and physicians' gender and perspective on shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study from Dubai.
    Alameddine M; Otaki F; Bou-Karroum K; Du Preez L; Loubser P; AlGurg R; Alsheikh-Ali A
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0270700. PubMed ID: 36048748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physicians' perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study.
    Alameddine M; AlGurg R; Otaki F; Alsheikh-Ali AA
    Hum Resour Health; 2020 May; 18(1):33. PubMed ID: 32381007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Association between physicians' and patients' perspectives of shared decision making in primary care settings in Japan: The impact of environmental factors.
    Goto Y; Miura H; Son D; Scholl I; Kriston L; Härter M; Sato K; Kusaba T; Arai H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0246518. PubMed ID: 33566830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dutch Translation and Psychometric Testing of the 9-Item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and Shared Decision Making Questionnaire-Physician Version (SDM-Q-Doc) in Primary and Secondary Care.
    Rodenburg-Vandenbussche S; Pieterse AH; Kroonenberg PM; Scholl I; van der Weijden T; Luyten GP; Kruitwagen RF; den Ouden H; Carlier IV; van Vliet IM; Zitman FG; Stiggelbout AM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132158. PubMed ID: 26151946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment Decision Making and Financial Toxicity in Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer.
    Wan C; Williams CP; Nipp RD; Pisu M; Azuero A; Aswani MS; Ingram SA; Pierce JY; Rocque GB
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Feb; 21(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 32741667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire: the entire process from translation to validation.
    Alzubaidi H; Hussein A; Mc Namara K; Scholl I
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e026672. PubMed ID: 30948608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychometric properties of the SDM-Q-9 questionnaire for shared decision-making in multiple sclerosis: item response theory modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Ballesteros J; Moral E; Brieva L; Ruiz-Beato E; Prefasi D; Maurino J
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):79. PubMed ID: 28431587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Shared Decision Making Among Older Adults With Advanced CKD.
    Frazier R; Levine S; Porteny T; Tighiouart H; Wong JB; Isakova T; Koch-Weser S; Gordon EJ; Weiner DE; Ladin K
    Am J Kidney Dis; 2022 Nov; 80(5):599-609. PubMed ID: 35351579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Momentum trial: the efficacy of using a smartphone application to promote patient activation and support shared decision making in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia in outpatient treatment settings: a randomized controlled single-blind trial.
    Vitger T; Austin SF; Petersen L; Tønder ES; Nordentoft M; Korsbek L
    BMC Psychiatry; 2019 Jun; 19(1):185. PubMed ID: 31208376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Shared decision making in the management of midshaft clavicular fractures: Nonoperative treatment or plate fixation.
    Woltz S; Krijnen P; Meylaerts SAG; Pieterse AH; Schipper IB
    Injury; 2017 Apr; 48(4):920-924. PubMed ID: 28262280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.