91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31408287)
1. Comparison of supine and prone miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of lower pole, middle pole and renal pelvic stones: A matched pair analysis.
Ozdemir H; Erbin A; Sahan M; Savun M; Cubuk A; Yazici O; Akbulut MF; Sarilar O
Int Braz J Urol; 2019; 45(5):956-964. PubMed ID: 31408287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of supine-prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy methods in the treatment of kidney stones in pediatric patients: prospective randomized study.
Eryılmaz R; Ertas K; Aslan R; Sevim M; Keles MF; Taken K
Urolithiasis; 2024 May; 52(1):73. PubMed ID: 38693402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Is supine a preferred position for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the pediatric age group? A randomized controlled study.
Tawfeek AM; Arafa H; Higazy A; Radwan A; Tawfick A
Minerva Urol Nephrol; 2024 Feb; 76(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 38426422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy and total tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the supine position.
Bildirici Ç; Çetin T; Yalçın MY; Özbilen MH; Karaca E; Karabacak MC; Çakıcı MÇ; Süelözgen T; Koç G
Urolithiasis; 2024 Jun; 52(1):82. PubMed ID: 38833070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating outcomes of complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn vs multiple non-staghorn renal stones: a 10-year study.
Falahatkar R; Shahraki T; Falahatkar S; Esmaeili S; Mashouf P
World J Urol; 2021 Aug; 39(8):3071-3077. PubMed ID: 33403437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Birowo P; Tendi W; Widyahening IS; Rasyid N; Atmoko W
F1000Res; 2020; 9():231. PubMed ID: 33014345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Could pain change position choice? Comparison of pain level, analgesic requirement and hospitalization time in supine and prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Bulut EC; Coşkun Ç; Koparal MY; Aydın U; Karabacak N
Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Apr; 56(4):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 37973696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prone vs supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does position affect renal pelvic pressures?
Farkouh A; Park K; Buell MI; Mack N; De Guzman C; Clark T; Baldwin EA; Shete K; Leu R; Amasyali AS; Seibly E; Cheng KW; Song S; Okhunov Z; Baldwin DD
Urolithiasis; 2024 Apr; 52(1):66. PubMed ID: 38630256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What should the optimal access site be for percutaneous treatment of anterior lower pole calyx stones?
Kucukyangoz M; Gucuk A
World J Urol; 2024 Mar; 42(1):176. PubMed ID: 38507069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigating Entire Collecting System During Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Is Rigid Nephroscopy Enough? A Prospective Study by International Alliance of Urolithiasis Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Working Group.
Gokce MI; Mazzon G; Nguyen D; Perez BM; Ibis MA; Zeng G; Sarica K
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2024 May; 34(5):415-419. PubMed ID: 38364181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of Simultaneous Bilateral Endoscopic Surgery in Prone Split-Leg Position for Bilateral Upper Urinary Tract Calculi: A Pilot Study.
Jiang Y; Sheng Y; Zhang J; Jiang Y; Shan H; Kang N
Urol Int; 2024; 108(3):190-197. PubMed ID: 38290486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of safety and efficacy of different positions in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a network meta-analysis.
Li P; Ma Y; Liao B; Jin X; Xiang L; Li H; Wang K
Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2411-2420. PubMed ID: 38445503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simplified biplanar (0-90°) versus monoplanar renal puncture technique in flank free modified supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy regarding outcomes and learning curve: Randomized clinical trial.
Elderey MS; Ali MM; Bendary L; Zaed EA; Desoky E; Ibrahim IM
Arab J Urol; 2024; 22(3):152-158. PubMed ID: 38818255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Supine versus Prone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.
Babaoff R; Creiderman G; Darawsha AE; Ehrlich Y; Somani B; Lifshitz DA
J Clin Med; 2024 Apr; 13(9):. PubMed ID: 38731021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of access sheath diameter used in percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: a prospective randomized study.
Özlü DN; Ekşi M; Şahin S; Kural A; Sipahi M; Kargı T; Bitkin A; Taşçı Aİ
Urolithiasis; 2024 Jun; 52(1):100. PubMed ID: 38922347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Supine tubeless upper pole PCNL under spinal anaesthesia: Safety, feasibility and outcomes from a tertiary endourology centre.
Kumar N; Somani B
Arab J Urol; 2024; 22(3):159-165. PubMed ID: 38818256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of large renal pelvic stones.
Haggag YM; Morsy G; Badr MM; Al Emam AB; Farid M; Etafy M
Can Urol Assoc J; 2013; 7(3-4):E171-5. PubMed ID: 23589752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acute Kidney Injury Post-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL): Prospective Outcomes from a University Teaching Hospital.
Pillai S; Kriplani A; Chawla A; Somani B; Pandey A; Prabhu R; Choudhury A; Pandit S; Taori R; Hegde P
J Clin Med; 2021 Mar; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 33805325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Delayed Surgical Intervention Following Emergency Department Presentation on Stone Surgery Complexity.
Bayne D; Maru J; Srirangapatanam S; Hicks C; Neuhaus J; Scales C; Chi T; Stoller M
J Endourol; 2023 Jun; 37(6):729-737. PubMed ID: 37158820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Correction to: Could pain change position choice? Comparison of pain level, analgesic requirement and hospitalization time in supine and prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Bulut EC; Coşkun Ç; Koparal MY; Aydın U; Karabacak N; Küpeli B
Int Urol Nephrol; 2024 Jul; 56(7):2277. PubMed ID: 38147195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
