These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3140847)

  • 41. Evaluation of commonly-used farm disinfectants in wet and dry models of Salmonella farm contamination.
    McLaren I; Wales A; Breslin M; Davies R
    Avian Pathol; 2011 Feb; 40(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 21331946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [The sensitivity to antibiotics and chloramine B of opportunistic microorganisms isolated from patients].
    Balakliets NI; Balakliets TI; Tsyganenko AIa; Partina FIa; Zozulia VV
    Mikrobiol Zh (1978); 1989; 51(6):83-6. PubMed ID: 2622404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [Activity tests on various disinfectants using the multipurpose device Pomosa S137-1 as disinfection equipment].
    Stellmacher W; Zerbe J; Schwebs M
    Arch Exp Veterinarmed; 1973; 27(2):327-40. PubMed ID: 4740709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of the growth characteristics of Candida albicans on disinfectant testing.
    van de Voorde H; van Dijck P; Reybrouck G
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg B Umwelthyg Krankenhaushyg Arbeitshyg Prav Med; 1987 May; 184(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 3113103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Comparison of phenol coefficient test and Kelsey Sykes' test using phenolic disinfectants.
    Choudhry M; Mandal A; Sharma KB
    Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 27(3):189-97. PubMed ID: 6530284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of three glutaraldehyde-based disinfectants used in endoscopy.
    Jetté LP; Ringuette L; Ishak M; Miller M; Saint-Antoine P
    J Hosp Infect; 1995 Aug; 30(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 7499810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Antimicrobial efficacy and compatibility of solid copper alloys with chemical disinfectants.
    Steinhauer K; Meyer S; Pfannebecker J; Teckemeyer K; Ockenfeld K; Weber K; Becker B
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(8):e0200748. PubMed ID: 30096209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative fungicidal activity of a new quaternary ammonium salt, N-alkyl-N-2-hydroxyethyl-N,N-dimethylammonium butyl phosphate and commonly used disinfectants.
    Ohta S; Makino M; Nagai K; Zenda H
    Biol Pharm Bull; 1996 Feb; 19(2):308-10. PubMed ID: 8850330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sporicidal activity of hospital disinfectants.
    Kelsey JC; Mackinnon IH; Maurer IM
    J Clin Pathol; 1974 Aug; 27(8):632-8. PubMed ID: 4213961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Mycobactericidal activity of selected disinfectants using a quantitative suspension test.
    Griffiths PA; Babb JR; Fraise AP
    J Hosp Infect; 1999 Feb; 41(2):111-21. PubMed ID: 10063473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. In vitro fungicidal activity of biocides against pharmaceutical environmental fungal isolates.
    Sandle T; Vijayakumar R; Saleh Al Aboody M; Saravanakumar S
    J Appl Microbiol; 2014 Nov; 117(5):1267-73. PubMed ID: 25155804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Antimicrobial activity of environmental surface disinfectants in the absence and presence of bioburden.
    Christensen RP; Robison RA; Robinson DF; Ploeger BJ; Leavitt RW; Bodily HL
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Oct; 119(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 2507609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Development and evaluation of a broth macrodilution method to determine the biocide susceptibility of bacteria.
    Feßler AT; Schug AR; Geber F; Scholtzek AD; Merle R; Brombach J; Hensel V; Meurer M; Michael GB; Reinhardt M; Speck S; Truyen U; Schwarz S;
    Vet Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 223():59-64. PubMed ID: 30173753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Microbicidal activity of monochloramine and chloramine T compared.
    Arnitz R; Nagl M; Gottardi W
    J Hosp Infect; 2009 Oct; 73(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 19717212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparative investigation of the bactericidal and fungicidal effects of three phenolic disinfectants.
    Hegna IK
    J Appl Bacteriol; 1977 Oct; 43(2):177-81. PubMed ID: 412825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A simple method for the in vitro study of the virucidal activity of disinfectants.
    Valot S; Edert D; Le Faou A
    J Virol Methods; 2000 Apr; 86(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 10713372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Review of disinfectant susceptibility of bacteria isolated in hospital to commonly used disinfectants.
    Shiraishi T; Nakagawa Y
    Postgrad Med J; 1993; 69 Suppl 3():S70-7. PubMed ID: 8290462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Model tests for effectiveness assay of disinfectants on surfaces. III. Dependence of test results on the type of substances and the test microbes (Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium terrae)].
    Peters J; Spicher G
    Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed; 1994 Jan; 195(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 8148019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Disinfection efficacy of chlorine and peracetic acid alone or in combination against Aspergillus spp. and Candida albicans in drinking water.
    Sisti M; Brandi G; De Santi M; Rinaldi L; Schiavano GF
    J Water Health; 2012 Mar; 10(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 22361698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Efficacy comparison of glutaraldehyde-phenate vs other glutaraldehydes in fomites disinfection, by different methods.
    Herruzo-Cabrera R; Gil-Miguel A; Fernandez-Arjona M; Rey-Calero J
    Minerva Med; 1994 Nov; 85(11):563-8. PubMed ID: 7808680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.