These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31410676)

  • 1. Evaluation of postoperative sensitivity in restorations with self-adhesive resin: a randomized split-mouth design controlled study.
    de Oliveira NG; Lima ASLC; da Silveira MT; de Souza Araújo PR; de Melo Monteiro GQ; de Vasconcelos Carvalho M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 May; 24(5):1829-1835. PubMed ID: 31410676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Morphological analysis and immunohistochemical expression in restorations with self-adhesive resin: A randomized split-mouth design-controlled study.
    de Oliveira NG; da Silveira MT; da Silva LP; Barros KM; Costa LM; Soares ML; Carvalho MV
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e927-e934. PubMed ID: 34603622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial.
    Carvalho AA; Leite MM; Zago JKM; Nunes CABCM; Barata TJE; Freitas GC; Torres ÉM; Lopes LG
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Nov; 19(1):252. PubMed ID: 31752813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity.
    Perdigão J; Geraldeli S; Hodges JS
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2003 Dec; 134(12):1621-9. PubMed ID: 14719760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microleakage of posterior composite restorations lined with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Al-Saleh M; El-Mowafy O; Tam L; Fenton A
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):556-63. PubMed ID: 20945747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of adhesive and flowable composite on postoperative sensitivity: 2-week results.
    Perdigão J; Anauate-Netto C; Carmo AR; Hodges JS; Cordeiro HJ; Lewgoy HR; Dutra-Corrêa M; Castilhos N; Amore R
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):777-84. PubMed ID: 15553285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year clinical performance of self-etching adhesive systems in composite restorations of anterior teeth.
    Barcellos DC; Batista GR; Silva MA; Pleffken PR; Rangel PM; Fernandes VV; Di Nicoló R; Torres CR
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 23110580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior resin composite restorations with prior application of a glutaraldehyde-based desensitizing solution: A randomized clinical trial.
    de Oliveira ILM; Hanzen TA; de Paula AM; Perdigão J; Montes MAJR; Loguercio AD; Monteiro GQM
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103918. PubMed ID: 34879245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postoperative sensitivity in posterior restorations restored with self-adhesive and conventional bulk-fill resin composites: A randomized clinical split-mouth trial.
    Maghaireh GA; Albashaireh ZS; Allouz HA
    J Dent; 2023 Oct; 137():104655. PubMed ID: 37562757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Five-year clinical performance of a silorane- vs a methacrylate-based composite combined with two different adhesive approaches.
    Baracco B; Fuentes MV; Ceballos L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jun; 20(5):991-1001. PubMed ID: 26388406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of surface treatment on the performance of silorane-based composite resin in class I restorations: a randomized clinical trial.
    Marques IP; de Oliveira FBS; Souza JGS; Ferreira RC; Magalhães CS; França FMG; Popoff DAV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2989-2996. PubMed ID: 29453496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions.
    Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD; Aparecida M; Machado M; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical, double blind, randomized controlled trial of experimental adhesive protocols in caries-affected dentin.
    Pintado-Palomino K; de Almeida CVVB; da Motta RJG; Fortes JHP; Tirapelli C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1855-1864. PubMed ID: 30218228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
    Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical evaluation of a two-step etch&rinse and a two-step self-etch adhesive system in Class II restorations: two-year results.
    Ermis RB; Kam O; Celik EU; Temel UB
    Oper Dent; 2009; 34(6):656-63. PubMed ID: 19953774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fang K; Chen K; Shi M; Wang L
    Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jun; 27(6):2495-2511. PubMed ID: 37017757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.