262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31411138)
1. Influence of Enthusiastic Language on the Credibility of Health Information and the Trustworthiness of Science Communicators: Insights From a Between-Subject Web-Based Experiment.
König L; Jucks R
Interact J Med Res; 2019 Aug; 8(3):e13619. PubMed ID: 31411138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Positive Language and Profession on Trustworthiness and Credibility in Online Health Advice: Experimental Study.
König L; Jucks R
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e16685. PubMed ID: 32154786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hot topics in science communication: Aggressive language decreases trustworthiness and credibility in scientific debates.
König L; Jucks R
Public Underst Sci; 2019 May; 28(4):401-416. PubMed ID: 30843467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Experts' Use of Medical Technical Jargon in Different Types of Online Health Forums Affects Perceived Information Credibility: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons.
Zimmermann M; Jucks R
J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e30. PubMed ID: 29362212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the Role of Communication for Information Seekers' Trust-Related Evaluations of Health Videos on the Web: Content Analysis, Survey Data, and Experiment.
Zimmermann M; Jucks R
Interact J Med Res; 2018 Dec; 7(2):e10282. PubMed ID: 30578181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Spelling Errors and Shouting Capitalization Lead to Additive Penalties to Trustworthiness of Online Health Information: Randomized Experiment With Laypersons.
Witchel HJ; Thompson GA; Jones CI; Westling CEI; Romero J; Nicotra A; Maag B; Critchley HD
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jun; 22(6):e15171. PubMed ID: 32519676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Believing in Expertise: How Authors' Credentials and Language Use Influence the Credibility of Online Health Information.
Thon FM; Jucks R
Health Commun; 2017 Jul; 32(7):828-836. PubMed ID: 27466693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.
Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Golzarri-Arroyo L
JMIR Res Protoc; 2022 Sep; 11(9):e41747. PubMed ID: 36044639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Trust and Credibility in Web-Based Health Information: A Review and Agenda for Future Research.
Sbaffi L; Rowley J
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e218. PubMed ID: 28630033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gaining trust as well as respect in communicating to motivated audiences about science topics.
Fiske ST; Dupree C
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Sep; 111 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):13593-7. PubMed ID: 25225372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the Credibility and Authenticity of Social Media Content for Applications in Health Communication: Scoping Review.
Jenkins EL; Ilicic J; Barklamb AM; McCaffrey TA
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Jul; 22(7):e17296. PubMed ID: 32706675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attacking science on social media: How user comments affect perceived trustworthiness and credibility.
Gierth L; Bromme R
Public Underst Sci; 2020 Feb; 29(2):230-247. PubMed ID: 31804151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
Picardi N
Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evoking vigilance: Would you (dis)trust a scientist who discusses ethical implications of research in a science blog?
Hendriks F; Kienhues D; Bromme R
Public Underst Sci; 2016 Nov; 25(8):992-1008. PubMed ID: 27150266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How heuristic credibility cues affect credibility judgments and decisions.
Gugerty L; Link DM
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Dec; 26(4):620-645. PubMed ID: 32658526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists' biographies: Benevolence beliefs.
Hautea S; Besley JC; Choung H
Public Underst Sci; 2024 Feb; ():9636625241228733. PubMed ID: 38369706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Balance as Credibility? How Presenting One- vs. Two-Sided Messages Affects Ratings of Scientists' and Politicians' Trustworthiness.
Hendriks F; Janssen I; Jucks R
Health Commun; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2757-2764. PubMed ID: 35980101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.
Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Golzarri-Arroyo L
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Mar; 25():e45482. PubMed ID: 36995753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Who is a credible source of preventive advice? An experimental vignette study of general public attitudes towards role expansion in health and social care.
Bull ER; Mills M; Byrne-Davis LMT; Hart JK
Br J Health Psychol; 2021 Feb; 26(1):198-213. PubMed ID: 32790002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
