These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

996 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31412001)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Sweden.
    Srivastava T; Prabhu VS; Li H; Xu R; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Pellissier JM; Perini RF; de Wit R; Mamtani R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 31412001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
    Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer.
    Sarfaty M; Hall PS; Chan KKW; Virik K; Leshno M; Gordon N; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 29576265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or atezolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States.
    Slater RL; Lai Y; Zhong Y; Li H; Meng Y; Moreno BH; Godwin JL; Frenkl T; Sonpavde GP; Mamtani R
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):967-977. PubMed ID: 32412387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States.
    Criss SD; Weaver DT; Sheehan DF; Lee RJ; Pandharipande PV; Kong CY
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):180.e11-180.e18. PubMed ID: 30528699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.
    Porte F; Granghaud A; Chang J; Kearney M; Morel A; Plessala I; Cawston H; Roiz J; Xiao Y; Solbes MN; Lambert P; Ravaud A; Loriot Y; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Lévy P
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302548. PubMed ID: 38728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pembrolizumab for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Gallacher D; Armoiry X; Auguste P; Court R; Mantopoulos T; Patterson J; De Santis M; Cresswell J; Mistry H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30030817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
    Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States.
    Hale O; Patterson K; Lai Y; Meng Y; Li H; Godwin JL; Homet Moreno B; Mamtani R
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Feb; 19(1):e17-e30. PubMed ID: 32826180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy. A Cochrane Rapid Review.
    Narayan V; Kahlmeyer A; Dahm P; Skoetz N; Risk MC; Bongiorno C; Patel N; Hwang EC; Jung JH; Gartlehner G; Kunath F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(7):CD012838. PubMed ID: 30036453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the United States.
    Peng Y; She Z; Peng L; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Li S; Wang L; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
    Adv Ther; 2021 Dec; 38(12):5710-5720. PubMed ID: 34693504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic NSCLC that Expresses High Levels of PD-L1 in the United States.
    Huang M; Lou Y; Pellissier J; Burke T; Liu FX; Xu R; Velcheti V
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Aug; 35(8):831-844. PubMed ID: 28620848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
    Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial.
    Nishiyama H; Yamamoto Y; Sassa N; Nishimura K; Fujimoto K; Fukasawa S; Yokoyama M; Enokida H; Takahashi K; Tanaka Y; Imai K; Shimamoto T; Perini R; Frenkl T; Bajorin D; Bellmunt J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 31729625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
    Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Ipilimumab-Naïve Patients with Advanced Melanoma in the United States.
    Wang J; Chmielowski B; Pellissier J; Xu R; Stevinson K; Liu FX
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 28125365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Carcinoma In Situ of the Bladder.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Saigal CS; Chamie K; Litwin MS; Packiam VT; Mossanen M; Pagliaro LC; Borah BJ; Boorjian SA
    J Urol; 2021 May; 205(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 33347775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden.
    Criss SD; Palazzo L; Watson TR; Paquette AM; Sigel K; Wisnivesky J; Kong CY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228288. PubMed ID: 31995619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
    Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 50.