BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

971 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31412001)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab as Second-line Therapy for the Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in Sweden.
    Srivastava T; Prabhu VS; Li H; Xu R; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Pellissier JM; Perini RF; de Wit R; Mamtani R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 3(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 31412001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for Patients with Advanced, Unresectable, or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy.
    Patterson K; Prabhu V; Xu R; Li H; Meng Y; Zarabi N; Zhong Y; Batteson R; Pellissier J; Keefe S; Grivas P; de Wit R
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 2(5):565-571. PubMed ID: 31412011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab in Second-line Advanced Bladder Cancer.
    Sarfaty M; Hall PS; Chan KKW; Virik K; Leshno M; Gordon N; Moore A; Neiman V; Rosenbaum E; Goldstein DA
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jul; 74(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 29576265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy or atezolizumab as second-line therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma in the United States.
    Slater RL; Lai Y; Zhong Y; Li H; Meng Y; Moreno BH; Godwin JL; Frenkl T; Sonpavde GP; Mamtani R
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):967-977. PubMed ID: 32412387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
    Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
    J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of PD-L1 testing on the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in the United States.
    Criss SD; Weaver DT; Sheehan DF; Lee RJ; Pandharipande PV; Kong CY
    Urol Oncol; 2019 Mar; 37(3):180.e11-180.e18. PubMed ID: 30528699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.
    Porte F; Granghaud A; Chang J; Kearney M; Morel A; Plessala I; Cawston H; Roiz J; Xiao Y; Solbes MN; Lambert P; Ravaud A; Loriot Y; Thiery-Vuillemin A; Lévy P
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302548. PubMed ID: 38728337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pembrolizumab for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    Gallacher D; Armoiry X; Auguste P; Court R; Mantopoulos T; Patterson J; De Santis M; Cresswell J; Mistry H
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2019 Jan; 37(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 30030817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost effectiveness of pembrolizumab vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC that expresses high levels of PD-L1 in Switzerland.
    Bhadhuri A; Insinga R; Guggisberg P; Panje C; Schwenkglenks M
    Swiss Med Wkly; 2019 Dec; 149():w20170. PubMed ID: 31880807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of Pembrolizumab versus Carboplatin-based Chemotherapy as First-line Treatment of PD-L1-positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Ineligible for Cisplatin-based Therapy in the United States.
    Hale O; Patterson K; Lai Y; Meng Y; Li H; Godwin JL; Homet Moreno B; Mamtani R
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2021 Feb; 19(1):e17-e30. PubMed ID: 32826180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma with disease progression during or following platinum-containing chemotherapy. A Cochrane Rapid Review.
    Narayan V; Kahlmeyer A; Dahm P; Skoetz N; Risk MC; Bongiorno C; Patel N; Hwang EC; Jung JH; Gartlehner G; Kunath F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Jul; 7(7):CD012838. PubMed ID: 30036453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost-Effectiveness of Avelumab Maintenance Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma in the United States.
    Peng Y; She Z; Peng L; Liu Q; Yi L; Luo X; Li S; Wang L; Qin S; Wan X; Tan C
    Adv Ther; 2021 Dec; 38(12):5710-5720. PubMed ID: 34693504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Standard-of-Care Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic NSCLC that Expresses High Levels of PD-L1 in the United States.
    Huang M; Lou Y; Pellissier J; Burke T; Liu FX; Xu R; Velcheti V
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Aug; 35(8):831-844. PubMed ID: 28620848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of cemiplimab vs pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.
    Paul E; Konidaris G; Cope S; Chen CI; Keeping S; Xu Y; Atsou K; Ayers D; Guyot P; Sasane M; Mojebi A; Kuznik A
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2021 Nov; 27(11):1513-1525. PubMed ID: 34351214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in recurrent, advanced urothelial cancer in Japanese patients: a subgroup analysis of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 trial.
    Nishiyama H; Yamamoto Y; Sassa N; Nishimura K; Fujimoto K; Fukasawa S; Yokoyama M; Enokida H; Takahashi K; Tanaka Y; Imai K; Shimamoto T; Perini R; Frenkl T; Bajorin D; Bellmunt J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):165-174. PubMed ID: 31729625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
    Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
    Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab Versus Ipilimumab in Ipilimumab-Naïve Patients with Advanced Melanoma in the United States.
    Wang J; Chmielowski B; Pellissier J; Xu R; Stevinson K; Liu FX
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2017 Feb; 23(2):184-194. PubMed ID: 28125365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-Unresponsive Carcinoma In Situ of the Bladder.
    Wymer KM; Sharma V; Saigal CS; Chamie K; Litwin MS; Packiam VT; Mossanen M; Pagliaro LC; Borah BJ; Boorjian SA
    J Urol; 2021 May; 205(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 33347775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with varying comorbidity burden.
    Criss SD; Palazzo L; Watson TR; Paquette AM; Sigel K; Wisnivesky J; Kong CY
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228288. PubMed ID: 31995619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.
    Liu Q; Tan C; Yi L; Wan X; Peng L; Li J; Luo X; Zeng X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0258605. PubMed ID: 34780478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.