These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31412669)

  • 1. Utilization of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction and High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.
    Asleh R; Resar JR
    J Clin Med; 2019 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 31412669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz AP; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor CG; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Feb; 4(2):e2037748. PubMed ID: 33616664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Association of Use of an Intravascular Microaxial Left Ventricular Assist Device vs Intra-aortic Balloon Pump With In-Hospital Mortality and Major Bleeding Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.
    Dhruva SS; Ross JS; Mortazavi BJ; Hurley NC; Krumholz HM; Curtis JP; Berkowitz A; Masoudi FA; Messenger JC; Parzynski CS; Ngufor C; Girotra S; Amin AP; Shah ND; Desai NR
    JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):734-745. PubMed ID: 32040163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical circulatory support versus vasopressors alone in patients with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Javaid AI; Michalek JE; Gruslova AB; Hoskins SA; Ahsan CH; Feldman MD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2024 Jan; 103(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 37997292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Current clinical management of acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
    El Nasasra A; Zeymer U
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2021 Jan; 19(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 33289436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Culprit-Only Versus Immediate Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicating Advanced Cardiogenic Shock Requiring Venoarterial-Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.
    Choi KH; Yang JH; Park TK; Lee JM; Song YB; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Ahn CM; Yu CW; Park IH; Jang WJ; Kim HJ; Bae JW; Kwon SU; Lee HJ; Lee WS; Jeong JO; Park SD; Kang TS; Gwon HC
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 May; 12(10):e029792. PubMed ID: 37158104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hemodynamic Support Devices for Shock and High-Risk PCI: When and Which One.
    Vetrovec GW
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2017 Aug; 19(10):100. PubMed ID: 28856523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Reperfusion therapy and mechanical circulatory support in patients in cardiogenic shock].
    Scholz KH
    Herz; 1999 Oct; 24(6):448-64. PubMed ID: 10546149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.
    Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Scheele N; Al Eryani H; Tousoulis D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):943-955. PubMed ID: 33729726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous coronary intervention in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    de Waha S; Jobs A; Eitel I; Pöss J; Stiermaier T; Meyer-Saraei R; Fuernau G; Zeymer U; Desch S; Thiele H
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2018 Feb; 7(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 28703046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Successful percutaneous coronary intervention with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a patient with acute inferior wall myocardial infarction complicated by electrical storm, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest: a case report.
    Yan B; Zhang G; Huang C; Liu Z
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2023 Jan; 18(1):47. PubMed ID: 36694197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Miyashita S; Banlengchit R; Marbach JA; Chweich H; Kawabori M; Kimmelstiel CD; Kapur NK
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jun; 39():28-35. PubMed ID: 34824038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ten-year trends, predictors and outcomes of mechanical circulatory support in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.
    Vallabhajosyula S; Prasad A; Sandhu GS; Bell MR; Gulati R; Eleid MF; Best PJM; Gersh BJ; Singh M; Lerman A; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Barsness GW;
    EuroIntervention; 2021 Feb; 16(15):e1254-e1261. PubMed ID: 31746759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multivessel Versus Culprit-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Cardiogenic Shock.
    Lemor A; Basir MB; Patel K; Kolski B; Kaki A; Kapur NK; Riley R; Finley J; Goldsweig A; Aronow HD; Belford PM; Tehrani B; Truesdell AG; Lasorda D; Bharadwaj A; Hanson I; LaLonde T; Gorgis S; O'Neill W;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 May; 13(10):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 32360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporary support strategies for cardiogenic shock: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, percutaneous ventricular assist devices and surgically placed extracorporeal ventricular assist devices.
    Massey HT; Choi JH; Maynes EJ; Tchantchaleishvili V
    Ann Cardiothorac Surg; 2019 Jan; 8(1):32-43. PubMed ID: 30854310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a critical appraisal.
    Masiero G; Cardaioli F; Tarantini G
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2022 Jun; 20(6):443-454. PubMed ID: 35587216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of mechanical support devices during percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Kanyal R; Byrne J
    JRSM Cardiovasc Dis; 2021; 10():20480040211014064. PubMed ID: 34691407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary revascularization and circulatory support strategies in patients with myocardial infarction, multi-vessel coronary artery disease, and cardiogenic shock: Insights from an international survey.
    Smilowitz NR; Galloway AC; Ohman EM; Rao SV; Bangalore S; Katz SD; Hochman JS
    Am Heart J; 2020 Jul; 225():55-59. PubMed ID: 32474205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Native Coronary Arteries Without Mechanical Circulatory Support in Acute Coronary Syndrome Without Cardiogenic Shock.
    Khalid N; Zhang C; Shea C; Shlofmitz E; Chen Y; Musallam A; Case BC; Yerasi C; Hashim H; Rogers T; Ben-Dor I; Bernardo NL; Satler LF; Waksman R
    Am J Cardiol; 2021 Nov; 158():37-44. PubMed ID: 34465454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.