These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31412685)

  • 1. An Integrated Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach to Assess Sustainable Urban Development in an Emerging Economy.
    Dang VT; Wang J; Van-Thac Dang W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Aug; 16(16):. PubMed ID: 31412685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Regional Water Resources Security Evaluation Based on a Hybrid Fuzzy BWM-TOPSIS Method.
    Tu Y; Chen K; Wang H; Li Z
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32664379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transshipment site selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment.
    Onüt S; Soner S
    Waste Manag; 2008; 28(9):1552-9. PubMed ID: 17768038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating lecturer performance in Vietnam: An application of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods.
    Do QH; Tran VT; Tran TT
    Heliyon; 2024 Jun; 10(11):e30772. PubMed ID: 38933935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection.
    Afrasiabi A; Tavana M; Di Caprio D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 May; 29(25):37291-37314. PubMed ID: 35050472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Integrated AHP-TOPSIS under a Fuzzy Environment for the Selection of Waste-To-Energy Technologies in Ghana: A Performance Analysis and Socio-Enviro-Economic Feasibility Study.
    Afrane S; Ampah JD; Agyekum EB; Amoh PO; Yusuf AA; Fattah IMR; Agbozo E; Elgamli E; Shouran M; Mao G; Kamel S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jul; 19(14):. PubMed ID: 35886280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integrated TOPSIS-COV approach for selecting a sustainable PET waste management technology: A case study in Qatar.
    Al-Thani NA; Al-Ansari T; Haouari M
    Heliyon; 2022 Aug; 8(8):e10274. PubMed ID: 36061036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Selection of data analytic techniques by using fuzzy AHP TOPSIS from a healthcare perspective.
    Alharbi A; Alosaimi W; Alyami H; Alouffi B; Almulihi A; Nadeem M; Sayeed MA; Khan RA
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2024 Sep; 24(1):240. PubMed ID: 39223530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landfill site selection by integrating fuzzy logic, AHP, and WLC method based on multi-criteria decision analysis.
    Zarin R; Azmat M; Naqvi SR; Saddique Q; Ullah S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):19726-19741. PubMed ID: 33410005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sustainable collection center location selection in emerging economy for electronic waste with fuzzy Best-Worst and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Sagnak M; Berberoglu Y; Memis İ; Yazgan O
    Waste Manag; 2021 May; 127():37-47. PubMed ID: 33930684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Developing A Sustainable Urban-Environmental Quality Evaluation System in China Based on A Hybrid Model.
    Shao Q; Weng SS; Liou JJH; Lo HW; Jiang H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 31013666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the sustainability of big data centers using the analytic network process and fuzzy TOPSIS.
    Zhang Q; Yang S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(14):17913-17927. PubMed ID: 33410015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the impact of green finance on sustainable tourism development in China.
    Fu M; Huang S; Ahmed S
    Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e31099. PubMed ID: 38778973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating modern intrusion detection methods in the face of Gen V multi-vector attacks with fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS.
    Alhakami W
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0302559. PubMed ID: 38743732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative analysis of three multi-criteria decision-making methods for land suitability assessment.
    Rashidi F; Sharifian S
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Aug; 194(9):657. PubMed ID: 35941257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sustainable forest management criteria and indicators assessment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.
    Bayram BÇ
    Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(7):425. PubMed ID: 34132901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bottled water quality ranking via the multiple-criteria decision-making process: a case study of two-stage fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS.
    Nabizadeh R; Yousefzadeh S; Yaghmaeian K; Alimohammadi M; Mokhtari Z
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Mar; 29(14):20437-20448. PubMed ID: 34735703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modelling built-up land expansion probability using the integrated fuzzy logic and coupling coordination degree model.
    Naikoo MW; Shahfahad ; Talukdar S; Ishtiaq M; Rahman A
    J Environ Manage; 2023 Jan; 325(Pt A):116441. PubMed ID: 36242974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. New approach for selecting a suitable recycling collection program for recovered paper and pulp recyclables using AHP-TOPSIS techniques.
    Bafail OA; Abdulaal RM
    Waste Manag Res; 2021 Nov; 39(11):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 33759660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An integrated framework for the comprehensive evaluation of low impact development strategies.
    Koc K; Ekmekcioğlu Ö; Özger M
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Sep; 294():113023. PubMed ID: 34119982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.