These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
572 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31417672)
1. Concurrent validity of lower extremity kinematics and jump characteristics captured in pre-school children by a markerless 3D motion capture system. Harsted S; Holsgaard-Larsen A; Hestbæk L; Boyle E; Lauridsen HH Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():39. PubMed ID: 31417672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of OpenCap: A low-cost markerless motion capture system for lower-extremity kinematics during return-to-sport tasks. Turner JA; Chaaban CR; Padua DA J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 171():112200. PubMed ID: 38905926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of a Commercially Available Markerless Motion-Capture System for Trunk and Lower Extremity Kinematics During a Jump-Landing Assessment. Mauntel TC; Cameron KL; Pietrosimone B; Marshall SW; Hackney AC; Padua DA J Athl Train; 2021 Feb; 56(2):177-190. PubMed ID: 33480993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and Intrarater Reliability of 2-Dimensional Motion Analysis Using a Handheld Tablet Compared to Traditional 3-Dimensional Motion Analysis. Belyea BC; Lewis E; Gabor Z; Jackson J; King DL J Sport Rehabil; 2015 Nov; 24(4):. PubMed ID: 25612081 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Test-retest reliability and agreement of lower-extremity kinematics captured in squatting and jumping preschool children using markerless motion capture technology. Harsted S; Holsgaard-Larsen A; Hestbæk L; Andreasen DL; Lauridsen HH Front Digit Health; 2022; 4():1027647. PubMed ID: 36544465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of lower limb and trunk kinematics between markerless and marker-based motion capture systems. Perrott MA; Pizzari T; Cook J; McClelland JA Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():57-61. PubMed ID: 27871019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements. Song K; Hullfish TJ; Scattone Silva R; Silbernagel KG; Baxter JR J Biomech; 2023 Aug; 157():111751. PubMed ID: 37552921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How reliable are lower limb biomechanical evaluations during volleyball-specific jump-landing tasks? De Bleecker C; Vermeulen S; Willems T; Segers V; Spanhove V; Pataky T; Roosen P; Vanrenterghem J; De Ridder R Gait Posture; 2024 Sep; 113():287-294. PubMed ID: 38972170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of the Kinect V2 for the assessment of lower extremity rehabilitation exercises. Wochatz M; Tilgner N; Mueller S; Rabe S; Eichler S; John M; Völler H; Mayer F Gait Posture; 2019 May; 70():330-335. PubMed ID: 30947108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Minimal Sensor Inertial Measurement Unit System Is Replicable and Capable of Estimating Bilateral Lower-Limb Kinematics in a Stationary Bodyweight Squat and a Countermovement Jump. Fain A; Hindle B; Andersen J; Nindl BC; Bird MB; Fuller JT; Wills JA; Doyle TLA J Appl Biomech; 2023 Feb; 39(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 36652950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inclusion of a skeletal model partly improves the reliability of lower limb joint angles derived from a markerless depth camera. Collings TJ; Devaprakash D; Pizzolato C; Lloyd DG; Barrett RS; Lenton GK; Thomeer LT; Bourne MN J Biomech; 2024 Jun; 170():112160. PubMed ID: 38824704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of frontal plane knee motion in males and females: A reliability and validity study. Simon M; Parizek C; Earl-Boehm JE; Bazett-Jones DM Knee; 2018 Dec; 25(6):1057-1064. PubMed ID: 30414788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Jump Performance and Its Relationship with Lower Body Joint Kinetics and Kinematics in Children with Cerebral Palsy. Thompson SE; Whitten SVW; Campbell KS; Singh T; Singh H; Li LI; Vova J; Modlesky CM Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2024 Jul; 56(7):1213-1224. PubMed ID: 38686962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. AI-smartphone markerless motion capturing of hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics during countermovement jumps. Barzyk P; Zimmermann P; Stein M; Keim D; Gruber M Eur J Sport Sci; 2024 Oct; 24(10):1452-1462. PubMed ID: 39205332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Kinematics during lower extremity functional screening tests in young athletes - are they reliable and valid? Whatman C; Hume P; Hing W Phys Ther Sport; 2013 May; 14(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 23088924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of kinematics between Theia markerless and conventional marker-based gait analysis in clinical patients. Wren TAL; Isakov P; Rethlefsen SA Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():9-14. PubMed ID: 37285635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automated Quantification of the Landing Error Scoring System With a Markerless Motion-Capture System. Mauntel TC; Padua DA; Stanley LE; Frank BS; DiStefano LJ; Peck KY; Cameron KL; Marshall SW J Athl Train; 2017 Nov; 52(11):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 29048200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Markerless motion capture can provide reliable 3D gait kinematics in the sagittal and frontal plane. Sandau M; Koblauch H; Moeslund TB; Aanæs H; Alkjær T; Simonsen EB Med Eng Phys; 2014 Sep; 36(9):1168-75. PubMed ID: 25085672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Concurrent assessment of gait kinematics using marker-based and markerless motion capture. Kanko RM; Laende EK; Davis EM; Selbie WS; Deluzio KJ J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110665. PubMed ID: 34380101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Agreement between An Inertia and Optical Based Motion Capture during the VU-Return-to-Play- Field-Test. Richter C; Daniels KAJ; King E; Franklyn-Miller A Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 32033123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]