These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

706 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31418085)

  • 1. Evaluation of treatment response in hepatocellular carcinoma in the explanted liver with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2017.
    Seo N; Kim MS; Park MS; Choi JY; Do RKG; Han K; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):261-271. PubMed ID: 31418085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of LI-RADS Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Transplant Candidates: Intraindividual Comparison between CT and Hepatobiliary Agent-enhanced MRI.
    Bae JS; Lee JM; Yoon JH; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Joo I; Lee KB; Kim H
    Radiology; 2021 May; 299(2):336-345. PubMed ID: 33650901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. LI-RADS version 2018 treatment response algorithm on extracellular contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and the added value of ancillary features.
    Wang D; Zhang Y; Lyu R; Jia K; Xu PJ
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Sep; 49(9):3045-3055. PubMed ID: 38605217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Adding Ancillary Features to MRI Compared with Enhancement Patterns at CT and MRI.
    Park S; Joo I; Lee DH; Bae JS; Yoo J; Kim SW; Lee JM
    Radiology; 2020 Sep; 296(3):554-561. PubMed ID: 32692297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LI-RADS treatment response categorization on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: diagnostic performance compared to mRECIST and added value of ancillary features.
    Kim SW; Joo I; Kim HC; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Jeon SK; Lee JM
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2861-2870. PubMed ID: 32006170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usefulness of Arterial Subtraction in Applying Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Algorithm to Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.
    Youn SY; Kim DH; Choi JI; Choi MH; Kim B; Shin YR; Oh SN; Rha SE
    Korean J Radiol; 2021 Aug; 22(8):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34047507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LI-RADS v2017 categorisation of HCC using CT: Does moderate to severe fatty liver affect accuracy?
    Kim SS; Hwang JA; Shin HC; Choi SY; Kang TW; Jou SS; Lee WH; Park S; Heo NH
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):186-194. PubMed ID: 30073499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Performance of CT/MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2017 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Roh YH; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ
    Liver Int; 2020 Jun; 40(6):1488-1497. PubMed ID: 32145134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporation of Ancillary MRI Features Into the LI-RADS Treatment Response Algorithm: Impact on Diagnostic Performance After Locoregional Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kim YY; Kim MJ; Yoon JK; Shin J; Roh YH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):484-493. PubMed ID: 34585608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does quantitative assessment of arterial phase hyperenhancement and washout improve LI-RADS v2018-based classification of liver lesions?
    Stocker D; Becker AS; Barth BK; Skawran S; Kaniewska M; Fischer MA; Donati O; Reiner CS
    Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2922-2933. PubMed ID: 32020398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018: Impact on Categorization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging.
    Chernyak V; Flusberg M; Berman J; Fruitman KC; Kobi M; Fowler KJ; Sirlin CB
    Liver Transpl; 2019 Oct; 25(10):1488-1502. PubMed ID: 31344753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Performance of LI-RADS Version 2018, LI-RADS Version 2017, and OPTN Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Kierans AS; Song C; Gavlin A; Roudenko A; Lu L; Askin G; Hecht EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1085-1092. PubMed ID: 32877248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Using Perfluorobutane: Impact of Proposed Modified LI-RADS Criteria on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection.
    Li L; Zheng W; Wang J; Han J; Guo Z; Hu Y; Li X; Zhou J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Sep; 219(3):434-443. PubMed ID: 35441534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimal imaging criteria and modality to determine Milan criteria for the prediction of post-transplant HCC recurrence after locoregional treatment.
    Seo N; Joo DJ; Park MS; Kim SS; Shin HJ; Chung YE; Choi JY; Kim MS; Kim MJ
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):501-511. PubMed ID: 35821427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic performance of MR for hepatocellular carcinoma based on LI-RADS v2018, compared with v2017.
    Ren AH; Zhao PF; Yang DW; Du JB; Wang ZC; Yang ZH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):746-755. PubMed ID: 30648327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hepatocellular carcinoma: Can LI-RADS v2017 with gadoxetic-acid enhancement magnetic resonance and diffusion-weighted imaging improve diagnostic accuracy?
    Zhang T; Huang ZX; Wei Y; Jiang HY; Chen J; Liu XJ; Cao LK; Duan T; He XP; Xia CC; Song B
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Feb; 25(5):622-631. PubMed ID: 30774276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What proportion of LI-RADS 5 observations reported in clinical practice do not meet LI-RADS 5 criteria?
    Ghadimi M; Birnbaum J; Kamel IR; Sirlin CB; Chernyak V
    Eur Radiol; 2022 May; 32(5):3327-3333. PubMed ID: 34807269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium-enhanced MRI.
    Lee SM; Lee JM; Ahn SJ; Kang HJ; Yang HK; Yoon JH
    Radiology; 2019 Sep; 292(3):655-663. PubMed ID: 31310175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Per-patient Negative Predictive Value of the CT and MRI Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2018 Treatment Response Algorithm for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Hassan OT; Behr SC; Ohliger MA; Fowler KJ; Gill RM; Fidelman N; Mehta N; Choi HH
    Radiology; 2023 Dec; 309(3):e222776. PubMed ID: 38112541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of LI-RADS 2018 and KLCA-NCC 2018 for noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Lee S; Kim SS; Chang DR; Kim H; Kim MJ
    Clin Mol Hepatol; 2020 Jul; 26(3):340-351. PubMed ID: 32492765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 36.