256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31419934)
1. Investigation of muscle transcriptomes using gradient boosting machine learning identifies molecular predictors of feed efficiency in growing pigs.
Messad F; Louveau I; Koffi B; Gilbert H; Gondret F
BMC Genomics; 2019 Aug; 20(1):659. PubMed ID: 31419934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analysis of merged whole blood transcriptomic datasets to identify circulating molecular biomarkers of feed efficiency in growing pigs.
Messad F; Louveau I; Renaudeau D; Gilbert H; Gondret F
BMC Genomics; 2021 Jul; 22(1):501. PubMed ID: 34217223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A transcriptome multi-tissue analysis identifies biological pathways and genes associated with variations in feed efficiency of growing pigs.
Gondret F; Vincent A; Houée-Bigot M; Siegel A; Lagarrigue S; Causeur D; Gilbert H; Louveau I
BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):244. PubMed ID: 28327084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Phenotypic and genetic relationships between growth and feed intake curves and feed efficiency and amino acid requirements in the growing pig.
Saintilan R; Brossard L; Vautier B; Sellier P; Bidanel J; van Milgen J; Gilbert H
Animal; 2015 Jan; 9(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 25192352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.
Liu T; Luo C; Wang J; Ma J; Shu D; Lund MS; Su G; Qu H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173620. PubMed ID: 28278209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole Blood Transcriptomics Is Relevant to Identify Molecular Changes in Response to Genetic Selection for Feed Efficiency and Nutritional Status in the Pig.
Jégou M; Gondret F; Vincent A; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Louveau I
PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146550. PubMed ID: 26752050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning applied to transcriptomic data to identify genes associated with feed efficiency in pigs.
Piles M; Fernandez-Lozano C; Velasco-Galilea M; González-Rodríguez O; Sánchez JP; Torrallardona D; Ballester M; Quintanilla R
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Mar; 51(1):10. PubMed ID: 30866799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Divergent selection for residual feed intake affects the transcriptomic and proteomic profiles of pig skeletal muscle.
Vincent A; Louveau I; Gondret F; Tréfeu C; Gilbert H; Lefaucheur L
J Anim Sci; 2015 Jun; 93(6):2745-58. PubMed ID: 26115262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Increased expressions of genes and proteins involved in mitochondrial oxidation and antioxidant pathway in adipose tissue of pigs selected for a low residual feed intake.
Louveau I; Vincent A; Tacher S; Gilbert H; Gondret F
J Anim Sci; 2016 Dec; 94(12):5042-5054. PubMed ID: 28046150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Post-weaning blood transcriptomic differences between Yorkshire pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Liu H; Nguyen YT; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC; Tuggle CK
BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():73. PubMed ID: 26801403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic parameters for feed efficiency traits and their relationships with growth and carcass traits in Duroc pigs.
Hoque MA; Suzuki K; Kadowaki H; Shibata T; Oikawa T
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Jun; 124(3):108-16. PubMed ID: 17550351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Difference in short-term responses to a high-fiber diet in pigs divergently selected for residual feed intake.
Montagne L; Loisel F; Le Naou T; Gondret F; Gilbert H; Le Gall M
J Anim Sci; 2014 Apr; 92(4):1512-23. PubMed ID: 24496835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative analysis of the transcriptome profiles of liver and muscle tissue in pigs divergent for feed efficiency.
Vigors S; O'Doherty JV; Bryan K; Sweeney T
BMC Genomics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):461. PubMed ID: 31170913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feed intake, average daily gain, feed efficiency, and real-time ultrasound traits in Duroc pigs: I. Genetic parameter estimation and accuracy of genomic prediction.
Jiao S; Maltecca C; Gray KA; Cassady JP
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jun; 92(6):2377-86. PubMed ID: 24671579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimation of the genetic parameters of traits relevant to feed efficiency: result from broiler lines divergent for high or low abdominal fat content.
Chen C; Su Z; Li Y; Luan P; Wang S; Zhang H; Xiao F; Guo H; Cao Z; Li H; Leng L
Poult Sci; 2021 Feb; 100(2):461-466. PubMed ID: 33518097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlated responses in sow appetite, residual feed intake, body composition, and reproduction after divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Billon Y; Lagant H; Guillouet P; Sellier P; Noblet J; Hermesch S
J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1097-108. PubMed ID: 22100596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetics of residual feed intake in growing pigs: Relationships with production traits, and nitrogen and phosphorus excretion traits.
Saintilan R; Mérour I; Brossard L; Tribout T; Dourmad JY; Sellier P; Bidanel J; van Milgen J; Gilbert H
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jun; 91(6):2542-54. PubMed ID: 23482579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating genome-wide co-association and gene expression to identify putative regulators and predictors of feed efficiency in pigs.
Ramayo-Caldas Y; Mármol-Sánchez E; Ballester M; Sánchez JP; González-Prendes R; Amills M; Quintanilla R
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):48. PubMed ID: 31477014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using quantile regression methodology to evaluate changes in the shape of growth curves in pigs selected for increased feed efficiency based on residual feed intake.
Nascimento M; Nascimento ACC; Dekkers JCM; Serão NVL
Animal; 2019 May; 13(5):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 30306885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review: divergent selection for residual feed intake in the growing pig.
Gilbert H; Billon Y; Brossard L; Faure J; Gatellier P; Gondret F; Labussière E; Lebret B; Lefaucheur L; Le Floch N; Louveau I; Merlot E; Meunier-Salaün MC; Montagne L; Mormede P; Renaudeau D; Riquet J; Rogel-Gaillard C; van Milgen J; Vincent A; Noblet J
Animal; 2017 Sep; 11(9):1427-1439. PubMed ID: 28118862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
