381 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31420049)
41. MetaSort untangles metagenome assembly by reducing microbial community complexity.
Ji P; Zhang Y; Wang J; Zhao F
Nat Commun; 2017 Jan; 8():14306. PubMed ID: 28112173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Extending and improving metagenomic taxonomic profiling with uncharacterized species using MetaPhlAn 4.
Blanco-Míguez A; Beghini F; Cumbo F; McIver LJ; Thompson KN; Zolfo M; Manghi P; Dubois L; Huang KD; Thomas AM; Nickols WA; Piccinno G; Piperni E; Punčochář M; Valles-Colomer M; Tett A; Giordano F; Davies R; Wolf J; Berry SE; Spector TD; Franzosa EA; Pasolli E; Asnicar F; Huttenhower C; Segata N
Nat Biotechnol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):1633-1644. PubMed ID: 36823356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Deeper insight into the structure of the anaerobic digestion microbial community; the biogas microbiome database is expanded with 157 new genomes.
Treu L; Kougias PG; Campanaro S; Bassani I; Angelidaki I
Bioresour Technol; 2016 Sep; 216():260-6. PubMed ID: 27243603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. CAMISIM: simulating metagenomes and microbial communities.
Fritz A; Hofmann P; Majda S; Dahms E; Dröge J; Fiedler J; Lesker TR; Belmann P; DeMaere MZ; Darling AE; Sczyrba A; Bremges A; McHardy AC
Microbiome; 2019 Feb; 7(1):17. PubMed ID: 30736849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Vikodak--A Modular Framework for Inferring Functional Potential of Microbial Communities from 16S Metagenomic Datasets.
Nagpal S; Haque MM; Mande SS
PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148347. PubMed ID: 26848568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reconstructing the genomic content of microbiome taxa through shotgun metagenomic deconvolution.
Carr R; Shen-Orr SS; Borenstein E
PLoS Comput Biol; 2013; 9(10):e1003292. PubMed ID: 24146609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Ecologically informed microbial biomarkers and accurate classification of mixed and unmixed samples in an extensive cross-study of human body sites.
Tackmann J; Arora N; Schmidt TSB; Rodrigues JFM; von Mering C
Microbiome; 2018 Oct; 6(1):192. PubMed ID: 30355348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. An Improved Machine Learning-Based Approach to Assess the Microbial Diversity in Major North Indian River Ecosystems.
Choudhury N; Sahu TK; Rao AR; Rout AK; Behera BK
Genes (Basel); 2023 May; 14(5):. PubMed ID: 37239442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. PanFP: pangenome-based functional profiles for microbial communities.
Jun SR; Robeson MS; Hauser LJ; Schadt CW; Gorin AA
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Sep; 8():479. PubMed ID: 26409790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Machine Learning Meta-analysis of Large Metagenomic Datasets: Tools and Biological Insights.
Pasolli E; Truong DT; Malik F; Waldron L; Segata N
PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Jul; 12(7):e1004977. PubMed ID: 27400279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Intrinsic correlation of oligonucleotides: a novel genomic signature for metagenome analysis.
Ding X; Cao CC; Sun X
J Theor Biol; 2014 Jul; 353():9-18. PubMed ID: 24631045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Selection of marker genes for genetic barcoding of microorganisms and binning of metagenomic reads by Barcoder software tools.
Rotimi AM; Pierneef R; Reva ON
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 30165813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The Landscape of Genetic Content in the Gut and Oral Human Microbiome.
Tierney BT; Yang Z; Luber JM; Beaudin M; Wibowo MC; Baek C; Mehlenbacher E; Patel CJ; Kostic AD
Cell Host Microbe; 2019 Aug; 26(2):283-295.e8. PubMed ID: 31415755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes.
Lin HH; Liao YC
Sci Rep; 2016 Apr; 6():24175. PubMed ID: 27067514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Urban Transit System Microbial Communities Differ by Surface Type and Interaction with Humans and the Environment.
Hsu T; Joice R; Vallarino J; Abu-Ali G; Hartmann EM; Shafquat A; DuLong C; Baranowski C; Gevers D; Green JL; Morgan XC; Spengler JD; Huttenhower C
mSystems; 2016; 1(3):. PubMed ID: 27822528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Estimating the total genome length of a metagenomic sample using k-mers.
Hua K; Zhang X
BMC Genomics; 2019 Apr; 20(Suppl 2):183. PubMed ID: 30967110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Interpretable metric learning in comparative metagenomics: The adaptive Haar-like distance.
Gorman ED; Lladser ME
PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1011543. PubMed ID: 38768195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Gene-based microbiome representation enhances host phenotype classification.
Deschênes T; Tohoundjona FWE; Plante PL; Di Marzo V; Raymond F
mSystems; 2023 Aug; 8(4):e0053123. PubMed ID: 37404032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Unsupervised Binning of Metagenomic Assembled Contigs Using Improved Fuzzy C-Means Method.
Liu Y; Hou T; Kang B; Liu F
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2017; 14(6):1459-1467. PubMed ID: 27295684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. MIPE: A metagenome-based community structure explorer and SSU primer evaluation tool.
Zou B; Li J; Zhou Q; Quan ZX
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0174609. PubMed ID: 28350876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
