BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31420049)

  • 81. CoMet: a workflow using contig coverage and composition for binning a metagenomic sample with high precision.
    Herath D; Tang SL; Tandon K; Ackland D; Halgamuge SK
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):571. PubMed ID: 29297295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Human and Extracellular DNA Depletion for Metagenomic Analysis of Complex Clinical Infection Samples Yields Optimized Viable Microbiome Profiles.
    Nelson MT; Pope CE; Marsh RL; Wolter DJ; Weiss EJ; Hager KR; Vo AT; Brittnacher MJ; Radey MC; Hayden HS; Eng A; Miller SI; Borenstein E; Hoffman LR
    Cell Rep; 2019 Feb; 26(8):2227-2240.e5. PubMed ID: 30784601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Learning Microbial Community Structures with Supervised and Unsupervised Non-negative Matrix Factorization.
    Cai Y; Gu H; Kenney T
    Microbiome; 2017 Aug; 5(1):110. PubMed ID: 28859695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Big Data, Evolution, and Metagenomes: Predicting Disease from Gut Microbiota Codon Usage Profiles.
    Fabijanić M; Vlahoviček K
    Methods Mol Biol; 2016; 1415():509-31. PubMed ID: 27115650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Functional metagenomic analysis of dust-associated microbiomes above the Red Sea.
    Aalismail NA; Ngugi DK; Díaz-Rúa R; Alam I; Cusack M; Duarte CM
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13741. PubMed ID: 31551441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Taxonomy-aware feature engineering for microbiome classification.
    Oudah M; Henschel A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):227. PubMed ID: 29907097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Average genome size estimation improves comparative metagenomics and sheds light on the functional ecology of the human microbiome.
    Nayfach S; Pollard KS
    Genome Biol; 2015 Mar; 16(1):51. PubMed ID: 25853934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Automatic disease prediction from human gut metagenomic data using boosting GraphSAGE.
    Syama K; Jothi JAA; Khanna N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Mar; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 37003965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Metagenomic characterization of ambulances across the USA.
    O'Hara NB; Reed HJ; Afshinnekoo E; Harvin D; Caplan N; Rosen G; Frye B; Woloszynek S; Ounit R; Levy S; Butler E; Mason CE
    Microbiome; 2017 Sep; 5(1):125. PubMed ID: 28938903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Piphillin: Improved Prediction of Metagenomic Content by Direct Inference from Human Microbiomes.
    Iwai S; Weinmaier T; Schmidt BL; Albertson DG; Poloso NJ; Dabbagh K; DeSantis TZ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166104. PubMed ID: 27820856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. A repository of microbial marker genes related to human health and diseases for host phenotype prediction using microbiome data.
    Han W; Ye Y
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2019; 24():236-247. PubMed ID: 30864326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. The impact of normalization and phylogenetic information on estimating the distance for metagenomes.
    Su CH; Wang TY; Hsu MT; Weng FC; Kao CY; Wang D; Tsai HK
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(2):619-28. PubMed ID: 21844636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Intensive allochthonous inputs along the Ganges River and their effect on microbial community composition and dynamics.
    Zhang SY; Tsementzi D; Hatt JK; Bivins A; Khelurkar N; Brown J; Tripathi SN; Konstantinidis KT
    Environ Microbiol; 2019 Jan; 21(1):182-196. PubMed ID: 30325092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Identifying personal microbiomes using metagenomic codes.
    Franzosa EA; Huang K; Meadow JF; Gevers D; Lemon KP; Bohannan BJ; Huttenhower C
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(22):E2930-8. PubMed ID: 25964341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Generation of a Metagenomics Proximity Ligation 3C Library of a Mammalian Gut Microbiota.
    Foutel-Rodier T; Thierry A; Koszul R; Marbouty M
    Methods Enzymol; 2018; 612():183-195. PubMed ID: 30502941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. MetaMIS: a metagenomic microbial interaction simulator based on microbial community profiles.
    Shaw GT; Pao YY; Wang D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):488. PubMed ID: 27887570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Strain profiling and epidemiology of bacterial species from metagenomic sequencing.
    Albanese D; Donati C
    Nat Commun; 2017 Dec; 8(1):2260. PubMed ID: 29273717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Details Matter: Designing Skin Microbiome Studies.
    Kong HH
    J Invest Dermatol; 2016 May; 136(5):900-902. PubMed ID: 27107375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. MetaNN: accurate classification of host phenotypes from metagenomic data using neural networks.
    Lo C; Marculescu R
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(Suppl 12):314. PubMed ID: 31216991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Microbiome-based disease prediction with multimodal variational information bottlenecks.
    Grazioli F; Siarheyeu R; Alqassem I; Henschel A; Pileggi G; Meiser A
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2022 Apr; 18(4):e1010050. PubMed ID: 35404958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.