These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
12. Invasive fractional-flow-reserve prediction by coronary CT angiography using artificial intelligence vs. computational fluid dynamics software in intermediate-grade stenosis. Peters B; Paul JF; Symons R; Franssen WMA; Nchimi A; Ghekiere O Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2024 Sep; 40(9):1875-1880. PubMed ID: 38963591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease. Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR with a new coarse-to-fine subpixel algorithm in detecting lesion-specific ischemia: a prospective multicenter study. Zeng Y; Wang X; Tang Z; Li T; Jiang X; Ji F; Zhou Y; Ge J; Li Z; Zhao Y; Ma C; Mintz GS; Nie S Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2024 Feb; 77(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 37453536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Coronary Calcification on the Diagnostic Performance of CT Angiography Derived FFR in Coronary Artery Disease: A Substudy of the NXT Trial. Nørgaard BL; Gaur S; Leipsic J; Ito H; Miyoshi T; Park SJ; Zvaigzne L; Tzemos N; Jensen JM; Hansson N; Ko B; Bezerra H; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Sep; 8(9):1045-1055. PubMed ID: 26298072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility and diagnostic performance of fractional flow reserve measurement derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in real clinical practice. Kawaji T; Shiomi H; Morishita H; Morimoto T; Taylor CA; Kanao S; Koizumi K; Kozawa S; Morihiro K; Watanabe H; Tazaki J; Imai M; Saito N; Shizuta S; Ono K; Togashi K; Kimura T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 27718139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve. Jiang W; Pan Y; Hu Y; Leng X; Jiang J; Feng L; Xia Y; Sun Y; Wang J; Xiang J; Li C Biomed Eng Online; 2021 Aug; 20(1):77. PubMed ID: 34348731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative atherosclerotic plaque volume by CT coronary angiography trumps conventional stenosis assessment for identifying flow-limiting lesions. Kato N; Kishi S; Arbab-Zadeh A; Rybicki FJ; Tanimoto S; Aoki J; Watanabe M; Horiuchi Y; Furui K; Hara K; Ibukuro K; Lima JAC; Tanabe K Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1847-1855. PubMed ID: 28597124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of operator expertise and coronary luminal segmentation technique on diagnostic performance, precision and reproducibility of reduced-order CT-derived fractional flow reserve technique. Ihdayhid AR; Sakaguchi T; Kerrisk B; Hislop-Jambrich J; Fujisawa Y; Nerlekar N; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(4):356-362. PubMed ID: 31787591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incremental Value of Subtended Myocardial Mass for Identifying FFR-Verified Ischemia Using Quantitative CT Angiography: Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography and CT-FFR. Yang DH; Kang SJ; Koo HJ; Kweon J; Kang JW; Lim TH; Jung J; Kim N; Lee JG; Han S; Ahn JM; Park DW; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Mintz GS; Kim YH JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 12(4):707-717. PubMed ID: 29361491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]