These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
1077 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31422141)
41. Additive value of epicardial adipose tissue quantification to coronary CT angiography-derived plaque characterization and CT fractional flow reserve for the prediction of lesion-specific ischemia. Brandt V; Decker J; Schoepf UJ; Varga-Szemes A; Emrich T; Aquino G; Bayer RR; Carson L; Sullivan A; Ellis L; von Knebel Doeberitz PL; Ebersberger U; Bekeredjian R; Tesche C Eur Radiol; 2022 Jun; 32(6):4243-4252. PubMed ID: 35037968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A study of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from a simplified method based on coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. Shi C; Zhang D; Cao K; Zhang T; Luo L; Liu X; Zhang H Biomed Eng Online; 2017 Apr; 16(1):43. PubMed ID: 28407768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) in patients before liver transplantation using CT-FFR machine learning algorithm. Schuessler M; Saner F; Al-Rashid F; Schlosser T Eur Radiol; 2022 Dec; 32(12):8761-8768. PubMed ID: 35729425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Integrating CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR in the Work-Up of Coronary Artery Disease. Coenen A; Rossi A; Lubbers MM; Kurata A; Kono AK; Chelu RG; Segreto S; Dijkshoorn ML; Wragg A; van Geuns RM; Pugliese F; Nieman K JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jul; 10(7):760-770. PubMed ID: 28109933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. CT Myocardial Perfusion and CT-FFR versus Invasive FFR for Hemodynamic Relevance of Coronary Artery Disease. Soschynski M; Storelli R; Birkemeyer C; Hagar MT; Faby S; Schwemmer C; Nous FMA; Pugliese F; Vliegenthart R; Schlett CL; Nikolaou K; Krumm P; Nieman K; Bamberg F; Artzner CP Radiology; 2024 Aug; 312(2):e233234. PubMed ID: 39162632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Prospective comparison of integrated on-site CT-fractional flow reserve and static CT perfusion with coronary CT angiography for detection of flow-limiting coronary stenosis. Guo W; Lin Y; Taniguchi A; Zhu Y; Tripathi P; Yang S; Liu J; Yun H; Jin H; Zhang J; Yang J; Zeng M Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5096-5105. PubMed ID: 33409778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. Koo BK; Erglis A; Doh JH; Daniels DV; Jegere S; Kim HS; Dunning A; DeFrance T; Lansky A; Leipsic J; Min JK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(19):1989-97. PubMed ID: 22032711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The influence of image quality on diagnostic performance of a machine learning-based fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography. Xu PP; Li JH; Zhou F; Jiang MD; Zhou CS; Lu MJ; Tang CX; Zhang XL; Yang L; Zhang YX; Wang YN; Zhang JY; Yu MM; Hou Y; Zheng MW; Zhang B; Zhang DM; Yi Y; Xu L; Hu XH; Liu H; Lu GM; Ni QQ; Zhang LJ Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2525-2534. PubMed ID: 32006167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Impact of Coronary Computerized Tomography Angiography-Derived Plaque Quantification and Machine-Learning Computerized Tomography Fractional Flow Reserve on Adverse Cardiac Outcome. von Knebel Doeberitz PL; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Albrecht MH; van Assen M; De Santis D; Gaskins J; Martin S; Bauer MJ; Ebersberger U; Giovagnoli DA; Varga-Szemes A; Bayer RR; Schönberg SO; Tesche C Am J Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 124(9):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31481177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Diagnostic performance of on-site CT-derived fractional flow reserve versus CT perfusion. Yang DH; Kim YH; Roh JH; Kang JW; Ahn JM; Kweon J; Lee JB; Choi SH; Shin ES; Park DW; Kang SJ; Lee SW; Lee CW; Park SW; Park SJ; Lim TH Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Apr; 18(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 27354345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps). Nørgaard BL; Leipsic J; Gaur S; Seneviratne S; Ko BS; Ito H; Jensen JM; Mauri L; De Bruyne B; Bezerra H; Osawa K; Marwan M; Naber C; Erglis A; Park SJ; Christiansen EH; Kaltoft A; Lassen JF; Bøtker HE; Achenbach S; J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 63(12):1145-1155. PubMed ID: 24486266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of diagnostic value of a novel noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography method versus standard coronary angiography for assessing fractional flow reserve. Renker M; Schoepf UJ; Wang R; Meinel FG; Rier JD; Bayer RR; Möllmann H; Hamm CW; Steinberg DH; Baumann S Am J Cardiol; 2014 Nov; 114(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 25205628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of Coronary Calcification Severity on Measurements and Diagnostic Performance of CT-FFR With Computational Fluid Dynamics: Results From CT-FFR CHINA Trial. Zhao N; Gao Y; Xu B; Yang W; Song L; Jiang T; Xu L; Hu H; Li L; Chen W; Li D; Zhang F; Fan L; Lu B Front Cardiovasc Med; 2021; 8():810625. PubMed ID: 35047581 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. CT Angiography for the Prediction of Hemodynamic Significance in Intermediate and Severe Lesions: Head-to-Head Comparison With Quantitative Coronary Angiography Using Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Budoff MJ; Nakazato R; Mancini GB; Gransar H; Leipsic J; Berman DS; Min JK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 May; 9(5):559-64. PubMed ID: 26897669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Diagnostic accuracy of CT-FFR with a new coarse-to-fine subpixel algorithm in detecting lesion-specific ischemia: a prospective multicenter study. Zeng Y; Wang X; Tang Z; Li T; Jiang X; Ji F; Zhou Y; Ge J; Li Z; Zhao Y; Ma C; Mintz GS; Nie S Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2024 Feb; 77(2):129-137. PubMed ID: 37453536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. What is the optimal anatomic location for coronary artery pressure measurement at CT-derived FFR? Solecki M; Kruk M; Demkow M; Schoepf UJ; Reynolds MA; Wardziak Ł; Dzielińska Z; Śpiewak M; Miłosz-Wieczorek B; Małek Ł; Marczak M; Kępka C J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(5):397-403. PubMed ID: 28844869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Effect of Calcification Based on Computer-Aided System on CT-Fractional Flow Reserve in Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Lesion. Fu D; Xiao X; Gao T; Feng L; Wang C; Yang P; Li X Comput Math Methods Med; 2022; 2022():7020209. PubMed ID: 35082914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The impact of iterative reconstruction algorithms on machine learning-based coronary CT angiography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR Li S; Chen C; Qin L; Gu S; Zhang H; Yan F; Yang W Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Jun; 36(6):1177-1185. PubMed ID: 32130576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]