These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31422275)

  • 1. The impact of concurrent linguistic tasks on participants' identification of spearcons.
    Davidson T; Ryu YJ; Brecknell B; Loeb R; Sanderson P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102895. PubMed ID: 31422275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Monitoring vital signs with time-compressed speech.
    Sanderson PM; Brecknell B; Leong S; Klueber S; Wolf E; Hickling A; Tang TL; Bell E; Li SYW; Loeb RG
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2019 Dec; 25(4):647-673. PubMed ID: 30883150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Supporting multiple patient monitoring with head-worn displays and spearcons.
    Klueber S; Wolf E; Grundgeiger T; Brecknell B; Mohamed I; Sanderson P
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Jul; 78():86-96. PubMed ID: 31046963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spearcons for Patient Monitoring: Laboratory Investigation Comparing Earcons and Spearcons.
    Li SYW; Tang TL; Hickling A; Yau S; Brecknell B; Sanderson PM
    Hum Factors; 2017 Aug; 59(5):765-781. PubMed ID: 28570832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spearcon Sequences for Monitoring Multiple Patients: Laboratory Investigation Comparing Two Auditory Display Designs.
    Li SYW; Tse MK; Brecknell B; Sanderson PM
    Hum Factors; 2019 Mar; 61(2):288-304. PubMed ID: 30260675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spearcons (speech-based earcons) improve navigation performance in advanced auditory menus.
    Walker BN; Lindsay J; Nance A; Nakano Y; Palladino DK; Dingler T; Jeon M
    Hum Factors; 2013 Feb; 55(1):157-82. PubMed ID: 23516800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing.
    Fairs A; Bögels S; Meyer AS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():131-148. PubMed ID: 30268022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Sound to Reduce Visual Distraction from In-vehicle Human-Machine Interfaces.
    Larsson P; Niemand M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 1():S25-30. PubMed ID: 26027972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Different Types of Auditory Warnings on Working Memory.
    Lei Z; Ma S; Li H; Yang Z
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():780657. PubMed ID: 35282225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spearcon compression levels influence the gap in comprehension between untrained and trained listeners.
    Srbinovska M; Salisbury IS; Loeb RG; Sanderson PM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 32915012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Media multitasking is associated with distractibility and increased prefrontal activity in adolescents and young adults.
    Moisala M; Salmela V; Hietajärvi L; Salo E; Carlson S; Salonen O; Lonka K; Hakkarainen K; Salmela-Aro K; Alho K
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 134():113-121. PubMed ID: 27063068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory frequency discrimination is correlated with linguistic skills, but its training does not improve them or other pitch discrimination tasks.
    Jakoby H; Raviv O; Jaffe-Dax S; Lieder I; Ahissar M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Nov; 148(11):1953-1971. PubMed ID: 30843719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of attention and task-relevance on the processing of syntactic violations during listening to two concurrent speech streams.
    Szalárdy O; Tóth B; Farkas D; Kovács A; Urbán G; Orosz G; Szabó BT; Hunyadi L; Hajdu B; Winkler I
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 18(5):932-948. PubMed ID: 29949114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abnormal motor cortex excitability during linguistic tasks in adductor-type spasmodic dysphonia.
    Suppa A; Marsili L; Giovannelli F; Di Stasio F; Rocchi L; Upadhyay N; Ruoppolo G; Cincotta M; Berardelli A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 42(4):2051-60. PubMed ID: 26061279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load Than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Rönnberg J; Rudner M
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):272-286. PubMed ID: 29923867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of speech intelligibility level on concurrent visual task performance.
    Payne DG; Peters LJ; Birkmire DP; Bonto MA; Anastasi JS; Wenger MJ
    Hum Factors; 1994 Sep; 36(3):441-75. PubMed ID: 7989051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linguistic entrenchment: Prior knowledge impacts statistical learning performance.
    Siegelman N; Bogaerts L; Elazar A; Arciuli J; Frost R
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():198-213. PubMed ID: 29705523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech interactions with linguistic, cognitive, and visuomotor tasks.
    Dromey C; Bates E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):295-305. PubMed ID: 15989393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Linguistic initiation signals increase auditory feedback error correction.
    Alsius A; Mitsuya T; Latif N; Munhall KG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):838. PubMed ID: 28863596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.