182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31423486)
1. A Case-Control Study to Add Volumetric or Clinical Mammographic Density into the Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Model.
Brentnall AR; Cohn WF; Knaus WA; Yaffe MJ; Cuzick J; Harvey JA
J Breast Imaging; 2019 Jun; 1(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 31423486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term Accuracy of Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Combining Classic Risk Factors and Breast Density.
Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Buist DSM; Bowles EJA
JAMA Oncol; 2018 Sep; 4(9):e180174. PubMed ID: 29621362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density adds accuracy to both the Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail breast cancer risk models in a prospective UK screening cohort.
Brentnall AR; Harkness EF; Astley SM; Donnelly LS; Stavrinos P; Sampson S; Fox L; Sergeant JC; Harvie MN; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Howell A; Cuzick J; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Dec; 17(1):147. PubMed ID: 26627479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A case-control evaluation of 143 single nucleotide polymorphisms for breast cancer risk stratification with classical factors and mammographic density.
Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Harkness EF; Rafiq S; Byers H; Astley SM; Sampson S; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J; Evans DGR
Int J Cancer; 2020 Apr; 146(8):2122-2129. PubMed ID: 31251818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I.
Warwick J; Birke H; Stone J; Warren RM; Pinney E; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW; Howell A; Cuzick J
Breast Cancer Res; 2014 Oct; 16(5):451. PubMed ID: 25292294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.
Astley SM; Harkness EF; Sergeant JC; Warwick J; Stavrinos P; Warren R; Wilson M; Beetles U; Gadde S; Lim Y; Jain A; Bundred S; Barr N; Reece V; Brentnall AR; Cuzick J; Howell T; Evans DG
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Feb; 20(1):10. PubMed ID: 29402289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of a mammographic texture marker for breast cancer risk in a case-control study.
Wang C; Brentnall AR; Mainprize J; Yaffe M; Cuzick J; Harvey JA
J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2020 Jan; 7(1):014003. PubMed ID: 32064299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative.
Kurian AW; Hughes E; Simmons T; Bernhisel R; Probst B; Meek S; Caswell-Jin JL; John EM; Lanchbury JS; Slavin TP; Wagner S; Gutin A; Rohan TE; Shadyab AH; Manson JE; Lane D; Chlebowski RT; Stefanick ML
Cancer; 2021 Oct; 127(20):3742-3750. PubMed ID: 34228814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Tyrer-Cuzick and Gail in Breast Cancer Screening in Jiangxi Province, China.
Zhang L; Jie Z; Xu S; Zhang L; Guo X
Med Sci Monit; 2018 Aug; 24():5528-5532. PubMed ID: 30089770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of the Interaction Between Mammographic Breast Density, Body Mass Index, and Menopausal Status With Breast Cancer Risk Among Korean Women.
Tran TXM; Moon SG; Kim S; Park B
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Dec; 4(12):e2139161. PubMed ID: 34940866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of using weight estimated from mammographic images
Nair KP; Harkness EF; Gadde S; Lim YY; Maxwell AJ; Moschidis E; Foden P; Cuzick J; Brentnall A; Evans DG; Howell A; Astley SM
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Mar; 10134():. PubMed ID: 34925706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer pathology and stage are better predicted by risk stratification models that include mammographic density and common genetic variants.
Evans DGR; Harkness EF; Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Astley SM; Byers H; Sampson S; Southworth J; Stavrinos P; Howell SJ; Maxwell AJ; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 30941651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Background risk of breast cancer influences the association between alcohol consumption and mammographic density.
Trinh T; Christensen SE; Brand JS; Cuzick J; Czene K; Sjölander A; Bälter K; Hall P
Br J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 113(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 26035701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Tyrer-Cuzick Model Inaccurately Predicts Invasive Breast Cancer Risk in Women With LCIS.
Valero MG; Zabor EC; Park A; Gilbert E; Newman A; King TA; Pilewskie ML
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 27(3):736-740. PubMed ID: 31559544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia.
Boughey JC; Hartmann LC; Anderson SS; Degnim AC; Vierkant RA; Reynolds CA; Frost MH; Pankratz VS
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Aug; 28(22):3591-6. PubMed ID: 20606088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.
Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Petersen K; Lillholm M; Nielsen MB; Lynge E; Uldall WY; Vejborg I
BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():414. PubMed ID: 27387546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density.
Moshina N; Roman M; Sebuødegård S; Waade GG; Ursin G; Hofvind S
Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):154-160. PubMed ID: 28565960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative validation of the BOADICEA and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk models incorporating classical risk factors and polygenic risk in a population-based prospective cohort of women of European ancestry.
Pal Choudhury P; Brook MN; Hurson AN; Lee A; Mulder CV; Coulson P; Schoemaker MJ; Jones ME; Swerdlow AJ; Chatterjee N; Antoniou AC; Garcia-Closas M
Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Feb; 23(1):22. PubMed ID: 33588869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
