142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31423613)
21. Fully automated flexible docking of ligands into flexible synthetic receptors using forward and inverse docking strategies.
Kämper A; Apostolakis J; Rarey M; Marian CM; Lengauer T
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):903-11. PubMed ID: 16563022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
Ding F; Dokholyan NV
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking.
Heo L; Shin WH; Lee MS; Seok C
Nucleic Acids Res; 2014 Jul; 42(Web Server issue):W210-4. PubMed ID: 24753427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Protein-ligand docking accounting for receptor side chain and global flexibility in normal modes: evaluation on kinase inhibitor cross docking.
May A; Zacharias M
J Med Chem; 2008 Jun; 51(12):3499-506. PubMed ID: 18517186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Conformational variability in proteins bound to single-stranded DNA: A new benchmark for new docking perspectives.
Mias-Lucquin D; Chauvot de Beauchene I
Proteins; 2022 Mar; 90(3):625-631. PubMed ID: 34617336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Protein-ligand docking against non-native protein conformers.
Verdonk ML; Mortenson PN; Hall RJ; Hartshorn MJ; Murray CW
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2214-25. PubMed ID: 18954138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets.
McGann M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Aug; 26(8):897-906. PubMed ID: 22669221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Docking ligands into flexible and solvated macromolecules. 3. Impact of input ligand conformation, protein flexibility, and water molecules on the accuracy of docking programs.
Corbeil CR; Moitessier N
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):997-1009. PubMed ID: 19391631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques.
Good AC; Cheney DL
J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep; 22(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12798388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility.
May A; Zacharias M
Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 17803217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
Kumar SP
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparative Evaluation of Covalent Docking Tools.
Scarpino A; Ferenczy GG; Keserű GM
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jul; 58(7):1441-1458. PubMed ID: 29890081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles.
Lorber DM; Shoichet BK
Protein Sci; 1998 Apr; 7(4):938-50. PubMed ID: 9568900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. DINC 2.0: A New Protein-Peptide Docking Webserver Using an Incremental Approach.
Antunes DA; Moll M; Devaurs D; Jackson KR; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e55-e57. PubMed ID: 29092940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Hybrid Cuckoo Search and Differential Evolution Approach to Protein⁻Ligand Docking.
Lin H; Siu SWI
Int J Mol Sci; 2018 Oct; 19(10):. PubMed ID: 30326669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
