These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31423613)

  • 41. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2016 Oct; 22(10):239. PubMed ID: 27638416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations.
    Feher M; Williams CI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. GalaxyDomDock: An Ab Initio Domain-domain Docking Web Server for Multi-domain Protein Structure Prediction.
    Choi J; Park T; Yul Lee S; Yang J; Seok C
    J Mol Biol; 2022 Jun; 434(11):167508. PubMed ID: 35662464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Rapid protein-ligand docking using soft modes from molecular dynamics simulations to account for protein deformability: binding of FK506 to FKBP.
    Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2004 Mar; 54(4):759-67. PubMed ID: 14997571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Protein-small molecule docking with receptor flexibility in iMOLSDOCK.
    Sam Paul D; Gautham N
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):889-900. PubMed ID: 30128925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Flexible ligand docking with Glide.
    Repasky MP; Shelley M; Friesner RA
    Curr Protoc Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; Chapter 8():Unit 8.12. PubMed ID: 18428795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Protein-ligand docking using mutually orthogonal Latin squares (MOLSDOCK).
    Viji SN; Prasad PA; Gautham N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Dec; 49(12):2687-94. PubMed ID: 19968302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Deep Learning Model for Efficient Protein-Ligand Docking with Implicit Side-Chain Flexibility.
    Masters MR; Mahmoud AH; Wei Y; Lill MA
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Mar; 63(6):1695-1707. PubMed ID: 36916514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility.
    Schueler-Furman O; Wang C; Baker D
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 15981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. PepPro: A Nonredundant Structure Data Set for Benchmarking Peptide-Protein Computational Docking.
    Xu X; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2020 Feb; 41(4):362-369. PubMed ID: 31793016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Flexible protein-ligand docking using the Fleksy protocol.
    Wagener M; Vlieg Jd; Nabuurs SB
    J Comput Chem; 2012 May; 33(12):1215-7. PubMed ID: 22371008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Improving binding mode and binding affinity predictions of docking by ligand-based search of protein conformations: evaluation in D3R grand challenge 2015.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2017 Aug; 31(8):689-699. PubMed ID: 28668990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A python-based docking program utilizing a receptor bound ligand shape: PythDock.
    Chung JY; Cho SJ; Hah JM
    Arch Pharm Res; 2011 Sep; 34(9):1451-8. PubMed ID: 21975806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
    Brylinski M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. PLIDflow: an open-source workflow for the online analysis of protein-ligand docking using galaxy.
    Ulzurrun E; Duarte Y; Perez-Wohlfeil E; Gonzalez-Nilo F; Trelles O
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Aug; 36(14):4203-4205. PubMed ID: 32415960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. GalaxySagittarius: Structure- and Similarity-Based Prediction of Protein Targets for Druglike Compounds.
    Yang J; Kwon S; Bae SH; Park KM; Yoon C; Lee JH; Seok C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):3246-3254. PubMed ID: 32401021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.