247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31424320)
21. Short-term quality of life after myomectomy for uterine fibroids from the COMPARE-UF Fibroid Registry.
Laughlin-Tommaso SK; Lu D; Thomas L; Diamond MP; Wallace K; Wegienka G; Vines AI; Anchan RM; Wang T; Maxwell GL; Jacoby V; Marsh EE; Spies JB; Nicholson WK; Stewart EA; Myers ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):345.e1-345.e22. PubMed ID: 31678093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy compared with conventional laparoscopic myomectomy: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.
Song T; Kim TJ; Lee SH; Kim TH; Kim WY
Fertil Steril; 2015 Nov; 104(5):1325-31. PubMed ID: 26263079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic Single-Site Plus One-Port Myomectomy versus Robotic Single-Site Plus Two-Port Myomectomy: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi SH; Won S; Lee N; Shim SH; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Jun HS; Seong SJ
Yonsei Med J; 2024 Jul; 65(7):406-412. PubMed ID: 38910303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Tips and Tricks: Single-Site Robotic-Assisted Myomectomy.
Moawad GN; Samuel D; Abi Khalil ED
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):861. PubMed ID: 27185456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Robotic single-site myomectomy: A single-center experience of 101 consecutive cases.
Kim M; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Feb; 15(1):e1959. PubMed ID: 30238688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Robot-assisted myomectomy.
Lonnerfors C
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jan; 46():113-119. PubMed ID: 29103894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Two New Techniques Complementing Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Coaxial Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy vs. Hybrid Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy.
Lee N; Choi SH; Won S; Jung YW; Kim SH; Lee JY; Lim CK; Yang JB; Ha JG; Seong SJ
J Pers Med; 2024 Apr; 14(4):. PubMed ID: 38673066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures and traditional laparoscopic myomectomy with barbed sutures.
Chen YC; Lin HH; Hsiao SM
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Oct; 57(5):709-712. PubMed ID: 30342656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Role of robotic surgery in treating fibroids and benign uterine mass.
Kim S; Luu TH; Llarena N; Falcone T
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Nov; 45():48-59. PubMed ID: 28551090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Minilaparotomy Versus Laparoscopic Myomectomy After Cessation of Power Morcellation: Rate of Wound Complications.
Dubin AK; Wei J; Sullivan S; Udaltsova N; Zaritsky E; Yamamoto MP
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(6):946-953. PubMed ID: 28552622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Single port laparoscopic myomectomy with intracorporeal suture-tying and transumbilical morcellation.
Lee JR; Lee JH; Kim JY; Chang HJ; Suh CS; Kim SH
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Oct; 181():200-4. PubMed ID: 25150961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Coaxial-Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy: Surgical Outcomes Compared with Robotic Single-Site Myomectomy by Propensity Score Matching Analysis.
Choi SH; Won S; Lee N; Shim SH; Kim MK; Kim ML; Jung YW; Yun BS; Seong SJ
J Pers Med; 2022 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36675678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy versus Abdominal Myomectomy for Large Myomas Sized over 10 cm or Weighing 250 g.
Lee SR; Lee ES; Lee YJ; Lee SW; Park JY; Kim DY; Kim SH; Kim YM; Suh DS; Kim YT
Yonsei Med J; 2020 Dec; 61(12):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 33251780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Transvaginal natural-orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a new approach to myomectomy.
Baekelandt J
Fertil Steril; 2018 Jan; 109(1):179. PubMed ID: 29129378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A case-control study to compare the outcome of women treated by two minimally invasive procedures-ultraminilaparotomy myomectomy and laparoscopic myomectomy.
Wen KC; Sung PL; Chang WH; Horng HC; Chen YJ; Lee WL; Wang PH
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 57(2):264-269. PubMed ID: 29673671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Laparoscopic Myomectomy with Temporary Bilateral Uterine Artery and Utero-Ovarian Vessels Occlusion Compared with Traditional Surgery for Uterine Fibroids: Blood Loss and Recurrence.
Jin L; Ji L; Shao M; Hu M
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2019; 84(6):548-554. PubMed ID: 30965324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Laparoscopic uterine artery bipolar coagulation plus myomectomy vs traditional laparoscopic myomectomy for "large" uterine fibroids: comparison of clinical efficacy.
Ciavattini A; Clemente N; Delli Carpini G; Saccardi C; Borgato S; Litta P
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Dec; 296(6):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 28956149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids versus laparoscopic myomectomy.
Brucker SY; Hahn M; Kraemer D; Taran FA; Isaacson KB; Krämer B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2014 Jun; 125(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 24698202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Symptoms and Health Quality After Laparoscopic and Robotic Myomectomy.
Takmaz O; Ozbasli E; Gundogan S; Bastu E; Batukan C; Dede S; Gungor M
JSLS; 2018; 22(4):. PubMed ID: 30524183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Advantages of Single-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Randomized Controlled Study.
Lee D; Kim SK; Kim K; Lee JR; Suh CS; Kim SH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):124-132. PubMed ID: 28826957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
