148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31425294)
21. Variation in outcomes across surgeons meeting the Leapfrog volume standard for complex oncologic surgery.
Aquina CT; Becerra AZ; Fleming FJ; Cloyd JM; Tsung A; Pawlik TM; Ejaz A
Cancer; 2021 Nov; 127(21):4059-4071. PubMed ID: 34292582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Influence of the learning curve for esophagectomy on patient survival].
Schröder W; Bruns CJ
Chirurg; 2016 Aug; 87(8):701. PubMed ID: 27481267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Outcomes of Complex Gastrointestinal Cancer Resection at US News & World Report Top-Ranked vs Non-Ranked Hospitals.
Tay E; Gambhir S; Stopenski S; Hohmann S; Smith BR; Daly S; Hinojosa MW; Nguyen NT
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Jul; 233(1):21-27.e1. PubMed ID: 33752982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of surgeon demographics and technique on outcomes after esophageal resections: a nationwide study.
Gopaldas RR; Bhamidipati CM; Dao TK; Markley JG
Ann Thorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 95(3):1064-9. PubMed ID: 23261119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The relationship between surgeon and hospital volume and outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty.
Jain N; Pietrobon R; Hocker S; Guller U; Shankar A; Higgins LD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):496-505. PubMed ID: 14996874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluating cumulative and annual surgeon volume in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Abelson JS; Spiegel JD; Afaneh C; Mao J; Sedrakyan A; Yeo HL
Surgery; 2017 Mar; 161(3):611-617. PubMed ID: 27771160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Short-term outcomes after esophagectomy at 164 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals: effect of operative approach and hospital-level variation.
Merkow RP; Bilimoria KY; McCarter MD; Phillips JD; DeCamp MM; Sherman KL; Ko CY; Bentrem DJ
Arch Surg; 2012 Nov; 147(11):1009-16. PubMed ID: 23165615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Colectomies Using a Large National Database: Outcomes and Trends Related to Surgery Center Volume.
Yeo HL; Isaacs AJ; Abelson JS; Milsom JW; Sedrakyan A
Dis Colon Rectum; 2016 Jun; 59(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 27145311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Esophageal Cancer Surgery: Spontaneous Centralization in the US Contributed to Reduce Mortality Without Causing Health Disparities.
Schlottmann F; Strassle PD; Charles AG; Patti MG
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Jun; 25(6):1580-1587. PubMed ID: 29349529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Esophagectomy outcomes at low-volume hospitals: the association between systems characteristics and mortality.
Funk LM; Gawande AA; Semel ME; Lipsitz SR; Berry WR; Zinner MJ; Jha AK
Ann Surg; 2011 May; 253(5):912-7. PubMed ID: 21422913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States medicare population.
Katz JN; Losina E; Barrett J; Phillips CB; Mahomed NN; Lew RA; Guadagnoli E; Harris WH; Poss R; Baron JA
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1622-9. PubMed ID: 11701783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on mortality, length of stay, and cost of pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Enomoto LM; Gusani NJ; Dillon PW; Hollenbeak CS
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Apr; 18(4):690-700. PubMed ID: 24297652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Optimal surgeon and hospital volume thresholds to reduce mortality and length of stay for CABG.
Chou YY; Hwang JJ; Tung YC
PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0249750. PubMed ID: 33852641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality.
LaPar DJ; Kron IL; Jones DR; Stukenborg GJ; Kozower BD
Ann Surg; 2012 Oct; 256(4):606-15. PubMed ID: 22964735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The hospital volume-outcome relationship in general thoracic surgery. Is the surgeon the critical determinant?
Urschel JD; Urschel DM
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2000 Feb; 41(1):153-5. PubMed ID: 10836244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Hospital esophageal cancer resection volume does not predict patient mortality risk.
Kozower BD; Stukenborg GJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 May; 93(5):1690-6; discussion 1696-8. PubMed ID: 22541199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A 10-year ACS-NSQIP Analysis of Trends in Esophagectomy Practices.
Zheng R; Tham EJH; Rios-Diaz AJ; Grenda TR; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F; Berger AC
J Surg Res; 2020 Dec; 256():103-111. PubMed ID: 32683050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. National trends in esophageal surgery--are outcomes as good as we believe?
Kohn GP; Galanko JA; Meyers MO; Feins RH; Farrell TM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2009 Nov; 13(11):1900-10; discussion 1910-2. PubMed ID: 19760305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Surgeon volume and established hospital perioperative mortality rate together predict for superior outcomes after open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Geiger JT; Fleming FJ; Stoner M; Doyle A
J Vasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 75(2):504-513.e3. PubMed ID: 34560221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
