These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31425362)

  • 1. Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-In-Noise Test Using Antiphasic Stimuli.
    De Sousa KC; Swanepoel W; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):442-450. PubMed ID: 31425362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-noise Testing as a Hearing Screening and Triage Tool to Classify Type of Hearing Loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):1037-1048. PubMed ID: 34799493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech Recognition in Noise Using Binaural Diotic and Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise in Children: Maturation and Self-Test Validity.
    Wolmarans J; De Sousa KC; Frisby C; Mahomed-Asmail F; Smits C; Moore DR; Swanepoel W
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 May; 32(5):315-323. PubMed ID: 34375996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity of the antiphasic digits-in-noise test to simulated unilateral and bilateral conductive hearing loss.
    Polspoel S; Moore DR; Swanepoel W; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2023 Nov; 62(11):1022-1030. PubMed ID: 36121040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pure-tone audiometry without bone-conduction thresholds: using the digits-in-noise test to detect conductive hearing loss.
    De Sousa KC; Smits C; Moore DR; Myburgh HC; Swanepoel W
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Oct; 59(10):801-808. PubMed ID: 32609044
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.
    Zadeh LM; Brennan V; Swanepoel W; Lin L; Moore DR
    medRxiv; 2023 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Remote self-report and speech-in-noise measures predict clinical audiometric thresholds.
    Motlagh Zadeh L; Brennan V; Swanepoel W; Lin L; Moore DR
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Aug; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 39109478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. French Version of the Antiphasic Digits-in-Noise Test for Smartphone Hearing Screening.
    Ceccato JC; Duran MJ; Swanepoel W; Smits C; De Sousa KC; Gledhill L; Venail F; Puel JL
    Front Public Health; 2021; 9():725080. PubMed ID: 34722438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The South African English Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Hearing Test: Effect of Age, Hearing Loss, and Speaking Competence.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Myburgh HC; Smits C
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):656-663. PubMed ID: 29189432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a Computer-Administered Version of the Digits-in-Noise Test for Hearing Screening in the United States.
    Folmer RL; Vachhani J; McMillan GP; Watson C; Kidd GR; Feeney MP
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Feb; 28(2):161-169. PubMed ID: 28240983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved Sensitivity of Digits-in-Noise Test to High-Frequency Hearing Loss.
    Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Swanepoel W; Moore DR
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):565-573. PubMed ID: 33928924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating a smartphone digits-in-noise test as part of the audiometric test battery.
    Potgieter JM; Swanepoel W; Smits C
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 2018 May; 65(1):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29781704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimal and Mild Hearing Loss in Children: Association with Auditory Perception, Cognition, and Communication Problems.
    Moore DR; Zobay O; Ferguson MA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):720-732. PubMed ID: 31633598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between the Dutch and American-English digits-in-noise (DIN) tests in normal-hearing listeners.
    Smits C; Watson CS; Kidd GR; Moore DR; Goverts ST
    Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 26940045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using the Digits-In-Noise Test to Estimate Age-Related Hearing Loss.
    Koole A; Nagtegaal AP; Homans NC; Hofman A; Baatenburg de Jong RJ; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):508-13. PubMed ID: 26871876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of a digits-in-noise hearing test in Persian.
    Motlagh Zadeh L; Silbert NH; Sternasty K; Moore DR
    Int J Audiol; 2021 Mar; 60(3):202-209. PubMed ID: 32903129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of the Mandarin Digit-in-Noise Test and Examination of the Effect of the Number of Digits Used in the Test.
    Wang S; Wong LLN
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):572-582. PubMed ID: 37990396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving the Efficiency of the Digits-in-Noise Hearing Screening Test: A Comparison Between Four Different Test Procedures.
    Dambha T; Swanepoel W; Mahomed-Asmail F; De Sousa KC; Graham MA; Smits C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):378-391. PubMed ID: 34890245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy.
    Haynes DS; O'Malley M; Cohen S; Watford K; Labadie RF
    Laryngoscope; 2007 Jan; 117(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 17202923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination of degrees of auditory performance from the digits-in-noise test based on hearing status.
    Armstrong NM; Oosterloo BC; Croll PH; Ikram MA; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Dec; 59(12):897-904. PubMed ID: 32673129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.