179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31425715)
1. How should we store avian faecal samples for microbiota analyses? Comparing efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Vargas-Pellicer P; Watrobska C; Knowles S; Schroeder J; Banks-Leite C
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Oct; 165():105689. PubMed ID: 31425715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of Sample Preservation and Storage Methods for Metaproteomics Analysis of Intestinal Microbiomes.
Mordant A; Kleiner M
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Dec; 9(3):e0187721. PubMed ID: 34908431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Storage and handling of human faecal samples affect the gut microbiome composition: A feasibility study.
Ezzy AC; Hagstrom AD; George C; Hamlin AS; Pereg L; Murphy AJ; Winter G
J Microbiol Methods; 2019 Sep; 164():105668. PubMed ID: 31302202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of preservation method on spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi) fecal microbiota over 8 weeks.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2015 Jun; 113():16-26. PubMed ID: 25819008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Stool Sample Preservation Methods on Gut Microbiota Biodiversity: New Original Data and Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.
Li XM; Shi X; Yao Y; Shen YC; Wu XL; Cai T; Liang LX; Wang F
Microbiol Spectr; 2023 Jun; 11(3):e0429722. PubMed ID: 37093040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliability of a participant-friendly fecal collection method for microbiome analyses: a step towards large sample size investigation.
Szopinska JW; Gresse R; van der Marel S; Boekhorst J; Lukovac S; van Swam I; Franke B; Timmerman H; Belzer C; Arias Vasquez A
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Sep; 18(1):110. PubMed ID: 30189859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of different storage methods to characterize the fecal bacterial communities of captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).
Vlčková K; Mrázek J; Kopečný J; Petrželková KJ
J Microbiol Methods; 2012 Oct; 91(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 22828127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Standard Sample Storage Conditions Have an Impact on Inferred Microbiome Composition and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns.
Poulsen CS; Kaas RS; Aarestrup FM; Pamp SJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0138721. PubMed ID: 34612701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of field conditions on fecal microbiota.
Hale VL; Tan CL; Niu K; Yang Y; Cui D; Zhao H; Knight R; Amato KR
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Nov; 130():180-188. PubMed ID: 27686380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample storage conditions induce post-collection biases in microbiome profiles.
Jenkins SV; Vang KB; Gies A; Griffin RJ; Jun SR; Nookaew I; Dings RPM
BMC Microbiol; 2018 Dec; 18(1):227. PubMed ID: 30591021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Variations of gut microbiome composition under different preservation solutions and periods].
Duan Y; Lü N; Cai F; Zhu B
Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao; 2020 Dec; 36(12):2525-2540. PubMed ID: 33398951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy for canine microbiota studies.
Lin CY; Cross TL; Doukhanine E; Swanson KS
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13383. PubMed ID: 32770113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of method for faecal sampling in cats and dogs for faecal microbiome analysis.
Langon X
BMC Vet Res; 2023 Dec; 19(1):274. PubMed ID: 38102642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An ambient-temperature storage and stabilization device performs comparably to flash-frozen collection for stool metabolomics in infants.
Ramamoorthy S; Levy S; Mohamed M; Abdelghani A; Evans AM; Miller LAD; Mehta L; Moore S; Freinkman E; Hourigan SK
BMC Microbiol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):59. PubMed ID: 33618670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles.
Choo JM; Leong LE; Rogers GB
Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16350. PubMed ID: 26572876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants.
Hill CJ; Brown JR; Lynch DB; Jeffery IB; Ryan CA; Ross RP; Stanton C; O'Toole PW
Microbiome; 2016 May; 4(1):19. PubMed ID: 27160322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods for Improving Human Gut Microbiome Data by Reducing Variability through Sample Processing and Storage of Stool.
Gorzelak MA; Gill SK; Tasnim N; Ahmadi-Vand Z; Jay M; Gibson DL
PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134802. PubMed ID: 26252519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Simple solution to preserve plant samples for microbiome analyses.
Carvalhais LC; Dennis PG; Poudel A; Birt HWG; Bhuiyan SA; Card SD; Joyce PA
Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Apr; 22(3):1055-1064. PubMed ID: 34695303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variations in the microbiome due to storage preservatives are not large enough to obscure variations due to factors such as host population, host species, body site, and captivity.
Asangba AE; Donohue ME; Lamb A; Wright PC; Halajian A; Leigh SR; Stumpf RM
Am J Primatol; 2019 Oct; 81(10-11):e23045. PubMed ID: 31471974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic Analysis of Impact of Sampling Regions and Storage Methods on Fecal Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Profiles.
Liang Y; Dong T; Chen M; He L; Wang T; Liu X; Chang H; Mao JH; Hang B; Snijders AM; Xia Y
mSphere; 2020 Jan; 5(1):. PubMed ID: 31915218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
