These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3142572)
1. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case against. Skrabanek P BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):971-2. PubMed ID: 3142572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The debate over mass mammography in Britain. The case for. Warren R BMJ; 1988 Oct; 297(6654):969-70. PubMed ID: 3142571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mammography and screening for breast cancer. Roebuck EJ Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1986 Jan; 292(6515):223-6. PubMed ID: 3081080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The debate over mass mammography in Great Britain. Day NE BMJ; 1988 Dec; 297(6662):1541-2. PubMed ID: 3147068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. For debate. Does breast cancer screening depend on a wobbly hypothesis? Watmough DJ; Bhargava S; Memon A; Syed F; Roy S; Sharma P J Public Health Med; 1997 Dec; 19(4):375-9. PubMed ID: 9467140 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast screening in Britain and Sweden. Lundgren B BMJ; 1988 Nov; 297(6658):1266. PubMed ID: 3145077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The technology of mammography. Misunderstood and underutilized. Fox SA; Kimme-Smith C; Klos DS Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1988; 4(4):521-44. PubMed ID: 10291098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Health technology assessment and screening in Sweden. Jonsson E; Banta HD; Schersten T Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(3):380-8. PubMed ID: 11495381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evidence-based screening in the United Kingdom. Gray JA Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2001; 17(3):400-8. PubMed ID: 11495383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening mammography: controversies and headlines. Jackson VP Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):323-6. PubMed ID: 12409561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for breast cancer. Duffy SW; Tabar L Lancet; 1995 Sep; 346(8978):852. PubMed ID: 7674788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography in 1986: keeping abreast of the times. Kearsley JH Med J Aust; 1986 Sep; 145(5):181-2. PubMed ID: 3747888 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Lancet supports Danish researchers against the breast cancer group. Mammography screening causes a conflict within Cochrane Collaboration]. Ohlin E Lakartidningen; 2001 Oct; 98(44):4815. PubMed ID: 11729791 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammography screening is not as good as we hoped. Jørgensen KJ Maturitas; 2010 Jan; 65(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 19939593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [The benefit of a population based mammography screening--scientifically proven or not?]. Stronegger WJ; Rásky E Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2003 Oct; 128(44):2329-30. PubMed ID: 14593578 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The breast test on trial. Cahill J Sr Nurse; 1994; 14(1):11-6, 21. PubMed ID: 8303144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The debate on breast cancer screening with mammography is important. Gøtzsche PC J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 17411511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]