751 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31425816)
1. Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical protocol.
Palm T; Wenkel E; Ohlmeyer S; Janka R; Uder M; Weiland E; Bickelhaupt S; Ladd ME; Zaitsev M; Hensel B; Laun FB
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():205-216. PubMed ID: 31425816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusional kurtosis imaging for differentiation of additional suspicious lesions on preoperative breast MRI of patients with known breast cancer.
Park VY; Kim SG; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Yoon JH; Kim MJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():199-208. PubMed ID: 31323316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging in the differentiation of malignant from benign breast lesions.
Liu W; Wei C; Bai J; Gao X; Zhou L
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():156-163. PubMed ID: 31307642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diffusion Kurtosis at 3.0T as an in vivo Imaging Marker for Breast Cancer Characterization: Correlation With Prognostic Factors.
Huang Y; Lin Y; Hu W; Ma C; Lin W; Wang Z; Liang J; Ye W; Zhao J; Wu R
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Mar; 49(3):845-856. PubMed ID: 30260589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of diffusion kurtosis imaging and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the differentiation of breast tumors.
Li T; Yu T; Li L; Lu L; Zhuo Y; Lian J; Xiong Y; Kong D; Li K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1358-1366. PubMed ID: 29717790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion kurtosis imaging for differentiating between the benign and malignant sinonasal lesions.
Jiang JX; Tang ZH; Zhong YF; Qiang JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1446-1454. PubMed ID: 27758016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Characterization of breast lesions using diffusion kurtosis model-based imaging: An initial experience.
Zhou WP; Zan XY; Hu XY; Liu X; Sudarshan SKP; Yang SD; Guo YJ; Fang XM
J Xray Sci Technol; 2020; 28(1):157-169. PubMed ID: 31815728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differentiating between malignant and benign solid solitary pulmonary lesions: are intravoxel incoherent motion and diffusion kurtosis imaging superior to conventional diffusion-weighted imaging?
Wan Q; Deng YS; Lei Q; Bao YY; Wang YZ; Zhou JX; Zou Q; Li XC
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1607-1615. PubMed ID: 30255258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of diffusion kurtosis imaging in characterization of breast lesions.
Christou A; Ghiatas A; Priovolos D; Veliou K; Bougias H
Br J Radiol; 2017 May; 90(1073):20160873. PubMed ID: 28383279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient at 3.0 T in urinary bladder lesions: correlation with pathologic findings.
Suo ST; Chen XX; Fan Y; Wu LM; Yao QY; Cao MQ; Liu Q; Xu JR
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):1027-34. PubMed ID: 24833566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion weighted imaging for the differentiation of breast tumors: From apparent diffusion coefficient to high order diffusion tensor imaging.
Teruel JR; Goa PE; Sjøbakk TE; Østlie A; Fjøsne HE; Bathen TF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1111-21. PubMed ID: 26494124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesions: Association with pathologic diagnosis and prognostic factors.
Suo S; Cheng F; Cao M; Kang J; Wang M; Hua J; Hua X; Li L; Lu Q; Liu J; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):740-750. PubMed ID: 28139036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The outstanding diagnostic value of DKI in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging for benign and malignant breast tumors: A diagnostic accuracy study.
Gao Y; Wang Y; Zhang H; Li X; Han L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Oct; 102(40):e35337. PubMed ID: 37800758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient values in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Çabuk G; Nass Duce M; Özgür A; Apaydın FD; Polat A; Orekici G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):141-8. PubMed ID: 25564776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
