These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31426947)

  • 1. How to think about shared norms and pluralism without circularity: A reply to Anna Leuschner.
    Eigi J
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2019 Jun; 75():51-56. PubMed ID: 31426947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What counts as relevant criticism? Longino's critical contextual empiricism and the feminist criticism of mainstream economics.
    Lari T
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Apr; 104():88-97. PubMed ID: 38493739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An infrastructural account of scientific objectivity for legal contexts and bloodstain pattern analysis.
    Koolage WJ; Williams LM; Barroso ML
    Sci Context; 2021 Mar; 34(1):101-119. PubMed ID: 36050810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Value management and model pluralism in climate science.
    Jebeile J; Crucifix M
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2021 Aug; 88():120-127. PubMed ID: 34166920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radical pluralism, classificatory norms and the legitimacy of species classifications.
    Conix S
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2019 Feb; 73():27-34. PubMed ID: 30429047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Evaluating normative epistemic frameworks in medicine: EBM and casuistic medicine".
    Bingeman E
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2016 Aug; 22(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 27122441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Pluralistic Perspective on Research in Psychotherapy: Harnessing Passion, Difference and Dialogue to Promote Justice and Relevance.
    Smith K; McLeod J; Blunden N; Cooper M; Gabriel L; Kupfer C; McLeod J; Murphie MC; Oddli HW; Thurston M; Winter LA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():742676. PubMed ID: 34552542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value pluralism in research integrity.
    Peels R; de Ridder J; Haven T; Bouter L
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2019; 4():18. PubMed ID: 31463085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Subjective from the start: A critique of transformative criticism.
    Milliken A
    Nurs Philos; 2017 Apr; 18(2):. PubMed ID: 28256811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hormone research as an exemplar of underdetermination.
    Magnus PD
    Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci; 2005 Sep; 36(3):559-67. PubMed ID: 16137603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism.
    Kusch M
    Synthese; 2017; 194(12):4687-4703. PubMed ID: 31258205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimal logical teleology in artifacts and biology connects the two domains and frames mechanisms via epistemic circularity.
    Pérez-Escobar JA
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2024 Apr; 104():23-37. PubMed ID: 38430647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality criteria under methodological pluralism: implications for conducting and evaluating research.
    Barker C; Pistrang N
    Am J Community Psychol; 2005 Jun; 35(3-4):201-12. PubMed ID: 15909795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychiatric pluralism in Bengal, India.
    Bhattacharyya DP
    Soc Sci Med; 1983; 17(14):947-56. PubMed ID: 6623104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Between relativism and pluralism: Philosophical and political relativism in Feyerabend's late work.
    Heller L
    Stud Hist Philos Sci; 2016 Jun; 57():96-105. PubMed ID: 27269268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epistemic communities and experts in health policy-making.
    Löblová O
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Nov; 28(suppl_3):7-10. PubMed ID: 30383255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pandemics, policy, and pluralism: A Feyerabend-inspired perspective on COVID-19.
    Bschir K; Lohse S
    Synthese; 2022; 200(6):441. PubMed ID: 36320863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Deadly pluralism? Why death-concept, death-definition, death-criterion and death-test pluralism should be allowed, even though it creates some problems.
    Zeiler K
    Bioethics; 2009 Oct; 23(8):450-9. PubMed ID: 18554277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epistemic neighbors: trespassing and the range of expert authority.
    Watson JC
    Synthese; 2022; 200(5):408. PubMed ID: 36189430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Taking Identity Seriously: On the Politics of the Individuation of Legal Systems.
    Mac Amhlaigh C
    Oxf J Leg Stud; 2022; 42(2):521-547. PubMed ID: 35615108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.