These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31428007)

  • 1. Bayesian Covariance Structure Modeling of Responses and Process Data.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1675. PubMed ID: 31428007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modeling Dependence Structures for Response Times in a Bayesian Framework.
    Klotzke K; Fox JP
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):649-672. PubMed ID: 31098935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayes Factor Covariance Testing in Item Response Models.
    Fox JP; Mulder J; Sinharay S
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):979-1006. PubMed ID: 28852944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing an alternative for "negative variance components": A gentle introduction to Bayesian covariance structure modeling for negative associations among patients with personalized treatments.
    Fox JP; Smink WAC
    Psychol Methods; 2023 Feb; 28(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 34928676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Joint Modeling of Compensatory Multidimensional Item Responses and Response Times.
    Man K; Harring JR; Jiao H; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Nov; 43(8):639-654. PubMed ID: 31551641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Joint Testlet Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling for Paired Local Item Dependence in Response Times and Response Accuracy.
    Zhan P; Liao M; Bian Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():607. PubMed ID: 29922192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Flexible Bayesian Dynamic Modeling of Correlation and Covariance Matrices.
    Lan S; Holbrook A; Elias GA; Fortin NJ; Ombao H; Shahbaba B
    Bayesian Anal; 2020 Dec; 15(4):1199-1228. PubMed ID: 33868547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditional Dependence between Response Time and Accuracy: An Overview of its Possible Sources and Directions for Distinguishing between Them.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D; De Boeck P
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():202. PubMed ID: 28261136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robust estimation of the hierarchical model for responses and response times.
    Ranger J; Wolgast A; Kuhn JT
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Feb; 72(1):83-107. PubMed ID: 30051905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bridging Models of Biometric and Psychometric Assessment: A Three-Way Joint Modeling Approach of Item Responses, Response Times, and Gaze Fixation Counts.
    Man K; Harring JR; Zhan P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jul; 46(5):361-381. PubMed ID: 35812811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Latent Space Diffusion Item Response Theory Model to Explore Conditional Dependence between Responses and Response Times.
    Kang I; Jeon M; Partchev I
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):830-864. PubMed ID: 37316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models.
    Epskamp S; Rhemtulla M; Borsboom D
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):904-927. PubMed ID: 28290111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling Nonlinear Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Molenaar D
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1525. PubMed ID: 30245650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Using a Response Time-Based Expected A Posteriori Estimator to Control for Differential Speededness in Computerized Adaptive Test.
    Kern JL; Choe E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jul; 45(5):361-385. PubMed ID: 34565941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Covariance Partition Priors: A Bayesian Approach to Simultaneous Covariance Estimation for Longitudinal Data.
    Gaskins JT; Daniels MJ
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2016 Jan; 25(1):167-186. PubMed ID: 27175055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian sparse graphical models and their mixtures.
    Talluri R; Baladandayuthapani V; Mallick BK
    Stat; 2014 Jan; 3(1):109-125. PubMed ID: 24948842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.