222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31429019)
1. Circumferential Shaving of the Cavity in Breast-Conserving Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chen K; Zhu L; Chen L; Li Q; Li S; Qiu N; Yang Y; Su F; Song E
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(13):4256-4263. PubMed ID: 31429019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Cavity Shave Margins in Breast Cancer.
Chagpar AB; Killelea BK; Tsangaris TN; Butler M; Stavris K; Li F; Yao X; Bossuyt V; Harigopal M; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Horowitz NR
N Engl J Med; 2015 Aug; 373(6):503-10. PubMed ID: 26028131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Excising Additional Margins at Initial Breast-Conserving Surgery (BCS) Reduces the Need for Re-excision in a Predominantly African American Population: A Report of a Randomized Prospective Study in a Public Hospital.
Jones V; Linebarger J; Perez S; Gabram S; Okoli J; Bumpers H; Burns B; Mosunjac M; Rizzo M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):456-64. PubMed ID: 26254169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effect of Lumpectomy and Cavity Shave Margin Status on Recurrence and Survival in Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Abdelsattar JM; Afridi FG; Dai Z; Yousaf N; Seldomridge A; Battin AO; Wen S; Gray D; Marsh JW; Cowher MS; Partin JF; Hazard-Jenkins H; Lupinacci K
Am Surg; 2023 Mar; 89(3):424-433. PubMed ID: 34196595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do All Positive Margins in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing a Partial Mastectomy Need to Be Resected?
Chagpar AB; Tsangaris TN; Lannin DR
J Am Coll Surg; 2018 Jul; 227(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 29524664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Impact of Intraoperative Margin Assessment in Breast-Conserving Surgery With a Novel Pegulicianine Fluorescence-Guided System: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.
Hwang ES; Beitsch P; Blumencranz P; Carr D; Chagpar A; Clark L; Dekhne N; Dodge D; Dyess DL; Gold L; Grobmyer S; Hunt K; Karp S; Lesnikoski BA; Wapnir I; Smith BL;
JAMA Surg; 2022 Jul; 157(7):573-580. PubMed ID: 35544130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of intraoperative cavity shaving on re-excision rates in breast-conserving surgery.
Ilhan B; Bademler S; Kılıç B; Onder S; Karanlık H
J Surg Oncol; 2023 Mar; 127(4):527-534. PubMed ID: 36434747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Economic Impact of Routine Cavity Margins Versus Standard Partial Mastectomy in Breast Cancer Patients: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Chagpar AB; Horowitz NR; Killelea BK; Tsangaris T; Longley P; Grizzle S; Loftus M; Li F; Butler M; Stavris K; Yao X; Harigopal M; Bossuyt V; Lannin DR; Pusztai L; Davidoff AJ; Gross CP
Ann Surg; 2017 Jan; 265(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 27192352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of systematic cavity shave margins in breast-conserving surgery at a large community hospital with a low baseline re-excision rate.
Vetter C; Ashok A; Perez M; Musaad S; Rahimi G; Gohil K; Higham A
Breast J; 2020 Oct; 26(10):1960-1965. PubMed ID: 33078470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the systematic circumferential tumor cavity shaving a representative sample for the remaining mammary gland? About 75 cases.
Bouzaiene H; Triki A; Ghalleb M; Chemlali M; Benzarti Z; Ben Hassouna J; Gammoudi A; Rahal K
Breast; 2017 Oct; 35():27-31. PubMed ID: 28644994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of Cavity Shave Margins on Margin Status in Patients with Pure Ductal Carcinoma In Situ.
Howard-McNatt M; Dupont E; Tsangaris T; Garcia-Cantu C; Chiba A; Berger AC; Levine EA; Gass JS; Ollila DW; Chagpar AB;
J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):373-378. PubMed ID: 33346081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast-Conserving Surgeries With and Without Cavity Shave Margins Have Different Re-excision Rates and Associated Overall Cost: Institutional and Patient-Driven Decisions for Its Utilization.
Cartagena LC; McGuire K; Zot P; Pillappa R; Idowu M; Robila V
Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(5):e594-e601. PubMed ID: 33814286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of margin assessment method on positive margin rate and total volume excised.
Moo TA; Choi L; Culpepper C; Olcese C; Heerdt A; Sclafani L; King TA; Reiner AS; Patil S; Brogi E; Morrow M; Van Zee KJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jan; 21(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 24046114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of cavity shaving on residual tumor rates in patients with primary invasive carcinoma and carcinoma in situ in breast conserving surgery.
Fernández-Pacheco M; Gerken M; Ortmann O; Ignatov A; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Hatzipanagiotou ME; Inwald EC
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 May; 307(5):1573-1583. PubMed ID: 36282347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implications of New Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines for Breast-Conserving Surgery: Changes in Reexcision Rates and Predicted Rates of Residual Tumor.
Merrill AL; Coopey SB; Tang R; McEvoy MP; Specht MC; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Smith BL
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):729-34. PubMed ID: 26467458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgeon Variability and Factors Predicting for Reoperation Following Breast-Conserving Surgery.
Valero MG; Mallory MA; Losk K; Tukenmez M; Hwang J; Camuso K; Bunnell C; King T; Golshan M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Sep; 25(9):2573-2578. PubMed ID: 29786129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaves off the Cavity or Specimen in Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer.
Iwai Y; Prigoff JG; Sun L; Wiechmann L; Taback B; Rao R; Ugras SK
J Surg Res; 2022 Sep; 277():296-302. PubMed ID: 35526391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors.
Wijgman DJ; Ten Wolde B; van Groesen NR; Keemers-Gels ME; van den Wildenberg FJ; Strobbe LJ
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):665-671. PubMed ID: 28041648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of routine cavity shave margins on breast cancer re-excision rates.
Kobbermann A; Unzeitig A; Xie XJ; Yan J; Euhus D; Peng Y; Sarode V; Moldrem A; Marilyn Leitch A; Andrews V; Stallings C; Rao R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 May; 18(5):1349-55. PubMed ID: 21046260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
