These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31429059)

  • 1. Concrete mindset impairs filtering in visual working memory.
    Hadar B; Luria R; Liberman N
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1917-1924. PubMed ID: 31429059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Filtering performance in visual working memory is improved by reducing early spatial attention to the distractors.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Psychophysiology; 2019 May; 56(5):e13323. PubMed ID: 30609072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gestalt grouping cues can improve filtering performance in visual working memory.
    Allon AS; Vixman G; Luria R
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1656-1672. PubMed ID: 29845437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory.
    Heuer A; Crawford JD; Schubö A
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Apr; 45(3):413-427. PubMed ID: 27822732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Flexible Coding of Visual Working Memory Representations during Distraction.
    Lorenc ES; Sreenivasan KK; Nee DE; Vandenbroucke ARE; D'Esposito M
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jun; 38(23):5267-5276. PubMed ID: 29739867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual working memory simultaneously guides facilitation and inhibition during visual search.
    Dube B; Basciano A; Emrich SM; Al-Aidroos N
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Jul; 78(5):1232-44. PubMed ID: 27055458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inhibition in movement plan competition: reach trajectories curve away from remembered and task-irrelevant present but not from task-irrelevant past visual stimuli.
    Moehler T; Fiehler K
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Nov; 235(11):3251-3260. PubMed ID: 28765992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Successful training of filtering mechanisms in multiple object tracking does not transfer to filtering mechanisms in a visual working memory task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
    Arend AM; Zimmer HD
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Aug; 50(10):2379-88. PubMed ID: 22722069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory-based attention capture when multiple items are maintained in visual working memory.
    Hollingworth A; Beck VM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Jul; 42(7):911-7. PubMed ID: 27123681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture.
    Lu J; Tian L; Zhang J; Wang J; Ye C; Liu Q
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):16314. PubMed ID: 29176675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual working memory capacity does not modulate the feature-based information filtering in visual working memory.
    Zhou J; Yin J; Chen T; Ding X; Gao Z; Shen M
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(9):e23873. PubMed ID: 21957441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pop-out and pop-in: Visual working memory advantages for unique items.
    Rajsic J; Sun SZ; Huxtable L; Pratt J; Ferber S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Dec; 23(6):1787-1793. PubMed ID: 27025501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Compensation mechanisms that improve distractor filtering are short-lived.
    Allon AS; Luria R
    Cognition; 2017 Jul; 164():74-86. PubMed ID: 28391134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involuntary top-down control by search-irrelevant features: Visual working memory biases attention in an object-based manner.
    Foerster RM; Schneider WX
    Cognition; 2018 Mar; 172():37-45. PubMed ID: 29223864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving attention control in dysphoria through cognitive training: transfer effects on working memory capacity and filtering efficiency.
    Owens M; Koster EH; Derakshan N
    Psychophysiology; 2013 Mar; 50(3):297-307. PubMed ID: 23350956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of visual working memory capacity on the filtering efficiency of emotional face distractors.
    Ye C; Xu Q; Liu Q; Cong F; Saariluoma P; Ristaniemi T; Astikainen P
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Oct; 138():63-72. PubMed ID: 30125615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In competition for the attentional template: can multiple items within visual working memory guide attention?
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1450-64. PubMed ID: 24730738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inability to suppress salient distractors predicts low visual working memory capacity.
    Gaspar JM; Christie GJ; Prime DJ; Jolicœur P; McDonald JJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Mar; 113(13):3693-8. PubMed ID: 26903654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of multisensory distraction on working memory: A role for task relevance?
    Turoman N; Vergauwe E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Aug; 50(8):1220-1248. PubMed ID: 38127491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Working memory load affects early affective responses to concrete and abstract words differently: Evidence from ERPs.
    Perry C; Willison AT; Walker MK; Nankivell MC; Lawrence LM; Thomas A
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 19(2):377-391. PubMed ID: 30671868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.