These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31429771)

  • 21. The impact of increased Al filtration on x-ray tube loading and image quality in diagnostic radiology.
    Behrman RH
    Med Phys; 2003 Jan; 30(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 12557981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Study of the Usefulness of the Constancy Tests in X-rays Image Processing Device by User].
    Tanaka N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(4):322-330. PubMed ID: 31006752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of reconstruction methods and x-ray tube current-time product on nodule detection in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom: A crossed-modality JAFROC observer study.
    Thompson JD; Chakraborty DP; Szczepura K; Tootell AK; Vamvakas I; Manning DJ; Hogg P
    Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1265-74. PubMed ID: 26936711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessing the accuracy of caries diagnosis via radiograph. Film versus print.
    Otis LL; Sherman RG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2005 Mar; 136(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 15819345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Technical innovation changes standard radiographic protocols in veterinary medicine: is it necessary to obtain two dorsoproximal-palmarodistal oblique views of the equine foot when using computerised radiography systems?
    Whitlock J; Dixon J; Sherlock C; Tucker R; Bolt DM; Weller R
    Vet Rec; 2016 May; 178(21):531. PubMed ID: 27114406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Calibration of coronary calcium scores determined using iterative image reconstruction (AIDR 3D) at 120, 100, and 80 kVp.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Goatman KA; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1921. PubMed ID: 27036588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Imaging quality of a digital Konica Regius 336 system for thoracic radiology].
    Ostinelli A; Frigerio M; Monti AF; Gelosa S; Tognoli P; Perniola N; Gozzi G
    Radiol Med; 2000 Jun; 99(6):465-8. PubMed ID: 11262825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Examining Practitioners' Assessments of Perceived Aesthetic and Diagnostic Quality of High kVp-Low mAs Pelvis, Chest, Skull, and Hand Phantom Radiographs.
    Lorusso JR; Fitzgeorge L; Lorusso D; Lorusso E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 46(2):162-173. PubMed ID: 31052090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
    Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
    Salát D; Nikodemová D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Patient dosimetry and image quality in digital radiology from online audit of the X-ray system.
    Vano E; Fernandez JM; Ten JI; Gonzalez L; Guibelalde E; Prieto C
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):199-203. PubMed ID: 16461529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digital chest radiography with a solid-state flat-panel x-ray detector: contrast-detail evaluation with processed images printed on film hard copy.
    Chotas HG; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 2001 Mar; 218(3):679-82. PubMed ID: 11230639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Some characteristics of solid-state and photo-stimulable phosphor detectors for intra-oral radiography.
    Borg E
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 139():i-viii, 1-67. PubMed ID: 10635104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Method for measuring the focal spot size of an x-ray tube using a coded aperture mask and a digital detector.
    Russo P; Mettivier G
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2099-115. PubMed ID: 21626943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Development of a 3D printed quality control tool for evaluation of x-ray beam alignment and collimation.
    Oliveira M; Barros JC; Ubeda C
    Phys Med; 2019 Sep; 65():29-32. PubMed ID: 31430583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
    Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.