These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31430295)

  • 21. You did not mean it: Perceived good intentions alleviate sense of unfairness.
    Ma Q; Meng L; Zhang Z; Xu Q; Wang Y; Shen Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Jun; 96(3):183-90. PubMed ID: 25863263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociation between medial frontal negativity and cardiac responses in the ultimatum game: Effects of offer size and fairness.
    Van der Veen FM; Sahibdin PP
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 11(4):516-25. PubMed ID: 21786030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
    Inaba M; Inoue Y; Akutsu S; Takahashi N; Yamagishi T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193877. PubMed ID: 29505587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impaired social cognition in schizophrenia during the Ultimatum Game: An EEG study.
    Horat SK; Favre G; Prévot A; Ventura J; Herrmann FR; Gothuey I; Merlo MCG; Missonnier P
    Schizophr Res; 2018 Feb; 192():308-316. PubMed ID: 28578921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A premium for positive social interest and attractive voices in the acceptability of unfair offers? An ERP study.
    Yuan Y; Shang J; Gao C; Sommer W; Li W
    Eur J Neurosci; 2024 Jul; 60(2):4078-4094. PubMed ID: 38777332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mentalizing in economic decision-making.
    Polezzi D; Daum I; Rubaltelli E; Lotto L; Civai C; Sartori G; Rumiati R
    Behav Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 190(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 18406476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The undermining effect of facial attractiveness on brain responses to fairness in the Ultimatum Game: an ERP study.
    Ma Q; Hu Y; Jiang S; Meng L
    Front Neurosci; 2015; 9():77. PubMed ID: 25805967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Social value orientation modulates fairness processing during social decision-making: evidence from behavior and brain potentials.
    Hu X; Mai X
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2021 Jul; 16(7):670-682. PubMed ID: 33769539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural correlates of decision making after unfair treatment.
    Wu Y; Zang Y; Yuan B; Tian X
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():123. PubMed ID: 25798102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influences of a Luck Game on Offers in Ultimatum and Dictator Games: Is There a Mediation of Emotions?
    Matarazzo O; Pizzini B; Greco C
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():13. PubMed ID: 32116888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. I'll make you an offer you can refuse: How socially sensitive is the MFN?
    Spapé MM; Dundas K
    Soc Neurosci; 2020 Feb; 15(1):123-127. PubMed ID: 31617454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A neural signature of the creation of social evaluation.
    Osinsky R; Mussel P; Ohrlein L; Hewig J
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Jun; 9(6):731-6. PubMed ID: 23547246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Altered behavioral and electrophysiological responses to social fairness in manic and euthymic patients with bipolar disorder.
    Ryu V; Ha RY; Cho HS
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2289. PubMed ID: 34291610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Social comparisons differentially affect fair and unfair processing in ultimatum bargaining.
    Li Q; Dai W; Zheng Y; Wang C; Yang Z; Ren Q; Hu K; Liu X
    Neuropsychologia; 2022 Sep; 174():108318. PubMed ID: 35830915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Lower dorsal striatum activation in association with neuroticism during the acceptance of unfair offers.
    Servaas MN; Aleman A; Marsman JB; Renken RJ; Riese H; Ormel J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 15(3):537-52. PubMed ID: 25720857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between platelet serotonin content and rejections of unfair offers in the ultimatum game.
    Emanuele E; Brondino N; Bertona M; Re S; Geroldi D
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 May; 437(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 18448251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. You are excusable! Neural correlates of economic neediness on empathic concern and fairness perception.
    Wang A; Zhu L; Lyu D; Cai D; Ma Q; Jin J
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2022 Feb; 22(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 34374029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Heart-rate deceleration predicting the determination of costly punishment: Implications for its involvement in cognitive effort expended in overriding self-interest.
    Osumi T; Ohira H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Nov; 109():29-36. PubMed ID: 27693101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Five-year-olds understand fair as equal in a mini-ultimatum game.
    Wittig M; Jensen K; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):324-37. PubMed ID: 23917161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Rejection of unfair offers in the ultimatum game is no evidence of strong reciprocity.
    Yamagishi T; Horita Y; Mifune N; Hashimoto H; Li Y; Shinada M; Miura A; Inukai K; Takagishi H; Simunovic D
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Dec; 109(50):20364-8. PubMed ID: 23188801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.