152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31430750)
1. Reproducibility of Microperimeter 3 (MP-3) Microperimetry in Open-Angle Glaucoma Patients.
Leisser C; Palkovits S; Hirnschall N; Georgiev S; Findl O
Ophthalmic Res; 2020; 63(3):302-308. PubMed ID: 31430750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Short wavelength automated perimetry, frequency doubling technology perimetry, and pattern electroretinography for prediction of progressive glaucomatous standard visual field defects.
Bayer AU; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 May; 109(5):1009-17. PubMed ID: 11986111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of optic neuropathy in glaucomatous eyes with normal standard visual fields using a test battery of short-wavelength automated perimetry and pattern electroretinography.
Bayer AU; Maag KP; Erb C
Ophthalmology; 2002 Jul; 109(7):1350-61. PubMed ID: 12093662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Circumpapillary microperimetry to detect glaucoma: a pilot study for sector-based comparison to circumpapillary retinal nerve fiber layer measurement.
Kita Y; Hollό G; Saito T; Murai A; Kita R; Hirakata A
Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jan; 39(1):127-136. PubMed ID: 29249069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison between microperimetry and standard achromatic perimetry of the central visual field in eyes with glaucomatous paracentral visual-field defects.
Lima VC; Prata TS; De Moraes CG; Kim J; Seiple W; Rosen RB; Liebmann JM; Ritch R
Br J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 94(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 19692366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fixation behavior in primary open angle glaucoma at early and moderate stage assessed by the MicroPerimeter MP-1.
Shi Y; Liu M; Wang X; Zhang C; Huang P
J Glaucoma; 2013 Feb; 22(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 21946547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating the Usefulness of MP-3 Microperimetry in Glaucoma Patients.
Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Hirasawa K; Yanagisawa M; Asaoka R
Am J Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 187():1-9. PubMed ID: 29248331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Flicker-defined form perimetry in glaucoma patients.
Horn FK; Kremers J; Mardin CY; Jünemann AG; Adler W; Tornow RP
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 253(3):447-55. PubMed ID: 25511293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The 8-year follow-up study for clinical diagnostic potentials of frequency-doubling technology perimetry for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss].
Fan X; Wu LL; Xiao GG; Ma ZZ; Liu F
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 54(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29518875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison and Correlation of Retinal Sensitivity Between Microperimetry and Standard Automated Perimetry in Low-tension Glaucoma.
Tepelus TC; Song S; Nittala MG; Nassisi M; Sadda SR; Chopra V
J Glaucoma; 2020 Oct; 29(10):975-980. PubMed ID: 32649448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pulsar perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
Zeppieri M; Brusini P; Parisi L; Johnson CA; Sampaolesi R; Salvetat ML
Am J Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 149(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 19800607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of microperimetry to compare macular light sensitivity in eyes with open-angle and angle-closure glaucoma.
Huang P; Shi Y; Wang X; Zhang SS; Zhang C
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2012 Mar; 56(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 22160406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microperimetry and optical coherence tomography imaging in the fellow eye of patients with unilateral focal ischaemic glaucoma.
Yusuf IH; Jolly JK; Ratnarajan G; Salmon JF
Eye (Lond); 2018 Aug; 32(8):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 29706619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of Functional Change in Preperimetric and Perimetric Glaucoma Using 10-2 Matrix Perimetry.
Jung KI; Park CK
Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 182():35-44. PubMed ID: 28734817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR Imaging of the Anterior Visual Pathway in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma: Correlation with Octopus 101 Perimetry and Spectralis Optical Coherence Tomography Findings.
Ersoz MG; Pekcevik Y; Ayintap E; Gunes İB; Mart DK; Yucel E; Türe G
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Jul; 42(7):995-1001. PubMed ID: 28632031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perimetric measurements with flicker-defined form stimulation in comparison with conventional perimetry and retinal nerve fiber measurements.
Horn FK; Tornow RP; Jünemann AG; Laemmer R; Kremers J
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Apr; 55(4):2317-23. PubMed ID: 24355823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correlation of Macular Ganglion Cell Complex Thickness With Frequency-doubling Technology Perimetry in Open-angle Glaucoma With Hemifield Defects.
Hayashi K; Araie M; Konno S; Tomidokoro A
J Glaucoma; 2016 May; 25(5):426-32. PubMed ID: 26035420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional evaluation of the macular area in early glaucoma using microperimetry.
Phuljhele S; Angmo D; Aalok L; Parwal S; Azad RV; Gupta V; Sihota R
Indian J Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 69(4):876-881. PubMed ID: 33727451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structure/Function relationship and retinal ganglion cells counts to discriminate glaucomatous damages.
Distante P; Lombardo S; Verticchio Vercellin AC; Raimondi M; Rolando M; Tinelli C; Milano G
BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 15():185. PubMed ID: 26711893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM
J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
