These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31431327)

  • 1. Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders.
    Yagci G; Erel S; Okunakol V
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(6):624-629. PubMed ID: 31431327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score.
    Karatepe AG; Günaydin R; Kaya T; Karlibaş U; Özbek G
    Rheumatol Int; 2009 Dec; 30(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 19370349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle.
    Angthong C
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-reported Foot and Ankle Score in patients with foot or ankle pain.
    Yazıcı G; Yazıcı MV; Bayraktar D; Varol F; Güçlü Gündüz A; Bek N
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2020 Jul; 54(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 32812874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for reliability, validity and responsiveness of Turkish Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM).
    Çelik D; Malkoç M; Martin R
    Rheumatol Int; 2016 Oct; 36(10):1469-76. PubMed ID: 27136921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Foot Function Index.
    Huh JW; Eun IS; Ko YC; Park MJ; Hwang KM; Park SH; Park TH; Park JH
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(4):759-61. PubMed ID: 27067199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of the Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire Brazilian-Portuguese version.
    Martinez BR; Staboli IM; Kamonseki DH; Budiman-Mak E; Yi LC
    Springerplus; 2016; 5(1):1810. PubMed ID: 27812449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Translation and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle outcome score.
    van Bergen CJ; Sierevelt IN; Hoogervorst P; Waizy H; van Dijk CN; Becher C
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jul; 134(7):897-901. PubMed ID: 24748232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran.
    Negahban H; Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Sohani SM; Askari M; Fanian H; Parnianpour M
    Clin Rheumatol; 2010 May; 29(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 20140474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Foot Function Index for Arabic-speaking patients (FFI-Ar): translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation study.
    Khan S; Faulkner S; Algarni FS; Almalki A; Almansour A; Altowaijri AM
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Apr; 17(1):212. PubMed ID: 35392981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of Turkish Version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale.
    Analay Akbaba Y; Celik D; Ogut RT
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2016; 55(6):1139-1142. PubMed ID: 27614824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for Patients With Chronic Ankle Disability.
    Anaforoglu Kulunkoglu B; Celik D
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jan; 58(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 30448187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders.
    Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B; Fırat N; Yıldız NT; Alkan A
    Turk J Med Sci; 2018 Jun; 48(3):476-483. PubMed ID: 29914240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Italian version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot and ankle diseases.
    Martinelli N; Scotto GM; Sartorelli E; Bonifacini C; Bianchi A; Malerba F
    Qual Life Res; 2014 Feb; 23(1):277-84. PubMed ID: 23689933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity and Reliability of Visual Analog Scale Foot and Ankle: The Turkish Version.
    Gur G; Turgut E; Dilek B; Baltaci G; Bek N; Yakut Y
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(6):1213-1217. PubMed ID: 28864388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Olerud-Molander Ankle Score in Patients With Malleolar Fracture.
    Büker N; Şavkın R; Gökalp O; Ök N
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(6):1209-1212. PubMed ID: 28765054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Translation, validity, and reliability of the Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) - Turkish version.
    Aydin Yağcioğlu G; Karapınar M
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2024 Aug; 40(8):1724-1730. PubMed ID: 37158698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score (OMAS).
    Turhan E; Demirel M; Daylak A; Huri G; Doral MN; Çelik D
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Jan; 51(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 27956082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
    Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery.
    Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D
    Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.