BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31432077)

  • 41. InterEvDock2: an expanded server for protein docking using evolutionary and biological information from homology models and multimeric inputs.
    Quignot C; Rey J; Yu J; Tufféry P; Guerois R; Andreani J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W408-W416. PubMed ID: 29741647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Utilizing random Forest QSAR models with optimized parameters for target identification and its application to target-fishing server.
    Lee K; Lee M; Kim D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Dec; 18(Suppl 16):567. PubMed ID: 29297315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
    Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Docking cyclic peptides formed by a disulfide bond through a hierarchical strategy.
    Tao H; Zhao X; Zhang K; Lin P; Huang SY
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(17):4109-4116. PubMed ID: 35801933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Cross-docking study on InhA inhibitors: a combination of Autodock Vina and PM6-DH2 simulations to retrieve bio-active conformations.
    Stigliani JL; Bernardes-Génisson V; Bernadou J; Pratviel G
    Org Biomol Chem; 2012 Aug; 10(31):6341-9. PubMed ID: 22751934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of consensus scoring methods for AutoDock Vina, smina and idock.
    Masters L; Eagon S; Heying M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2020 May; 96():107532. PubMed ID: 31991303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Adverse drug reaction prediction using scores produced by large-scale drug-protein target docking on high-performance computing machines.
    LaBute MX; Zhang X; Lenderman J; Bennion BJ; Wong SE; Lightstone FC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106298. PubMed ID: 25191698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Meta-server for automatic analysis, scoring and ranking of docking models.
    Anashkina AA; Kravatsky Y; Kuznetsov E; Makarov AA; Adzhubei AA
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jan; 34(2):297-299. PubMed ID: 28968724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. AutoDock and AutoDockTools for Protein-Ligand Docking: Beta-Site Amyloid Precursor Protein Cleaving Enzyme 1(BACE1) as a Case Study.
    El-Hachem N; Haibe-Kains B; Khalil A; Kobeissy FH; Nemer G
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():391-403. PubMed ID: 28508374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. MTiOpenScreen: a web server for structure-based virtual screening.
    Labbé CM; Rey J; Lagorce D; Vavruša M; Becot J; Sperandio O; Villoutreix BO; Tufféry P; Miteva MA
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W448-54. PubMed ID: 25855812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. FlexAID: Revisiting Docking on Non-Native-Complex Structures.
    Gaudreault F; Najmanovich RJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1323-36. PubMed ID: 26076070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. MDockPeP: An ab-initio protein-peptide docking server.
    Xu X; Yan C; Zou X
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Oct; 39(28):2409-2413. PubMed ID: 30368849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Protein-protein interaction specificity is captured by contact preferences and interface composition.
    Nadalin F; Carbone A
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Feb; 34(3):459-468. PubMed ID: 29028884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The Augmenting Effects of Desolvation and Conformational Energy Terms on the Predictions of Docking Programs against mPGES-1.
    Gupta A; Chaudhary N; Kakularam KR; Pallu R; Polamarasetty A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134472. PubMed ID: 26305898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Multiple grid arrangement improves ligand docking with unknown binding sites: Application to the inverse docking problem.
    Ban T; Ohue M; Akiyama Y
    Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Apr; 73():139-146. PubMed ID: 29482137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Introducing a Clustering Step in a Consensus Approach for the Scoring of Protein-Protein Docking Models.
    Chermak E; De Donato R; Lensink MF; Petta A; Serra L; Scarano V; Cavallo L; Oliva R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166460. PubMed ID: 27846259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. HPEPDOCK: a web server for blind peptide-protein docking based on a hierarchical algorithm.
    Zhou P; Jin B; Li H; Huang SY
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2018 Jul; 46(W1):W443-W450. PubMed ID: 29746661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. CaverDock: a molecular docking-based tool to analyse ligand transport through protein tunnels and channels.
    Vavra O; Filipovic J; Plhak J; Bednar D; Marques SM; Brezovsky J; Stourac J; Matyska L; Damborsky J
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(23):4986-4993. PubMed ID: 31077297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.